Message from @El Comte
Discord ID: 649053295868117022
To support that conclusion
This is how primates and then humans developed
Pretty sure even homo habilis was ape like
So your ideas are still flawed
More than us definitely but he didn't look like one
ya looked into it they have no dna evidence or anything to prove it is our ancestor all they are going by is skull shape
Source?
you did not even put a source for your claim that it was related
Australopithecus, (Latin: “southern ape”) (genus Australopithecus), group of extinct primates closely related to, if not actually ancestors of, modern human beings and known from a series of fossils found at numerous sites in eastern,
and was thought to have been a direct ancestor of modern humans. (key word is THOUGHT"
Thought for a reason moron
It says in the article
you said evidence
That I sent
you said WE KNOW
where is the evidence? a hunch is not evidence
Viable ancestor of the genus homo. Basically the scientists agree he's mostly our ancestor or similar to them
fucking idiot
It isn't a hunch.
seriously you can not back up your argument so you resort to "moron" "idiot"
then PROVE IT
Mr. Eternal AngloToday at 8:00 PM
I.e. there is evidence
To support that conclusion
WHERE?
Your own source says that it is most likely
just post it
SCOURCE plz
MOST LIKELY not definitively proven
I sent a link which talks a bit about it. Think for a second: why would it be believed if there wasn't any evidence?
I'll find more evidence if you insist
people believe a lot of things
Sure, but well educated scientists?
more? how about any?
Definitely proven is basically non-existent in science. It's always about what's most likely the case and the most likely scenario. It's all hypothesis and theory. That's how the method works
there is electric universe theory, there is string theory, scientists disagree on many things
Theories are just that: theories
They are not proven
So they cannot be taken as facts