Bruh missing link how retarded are you @Puppet Master watching too much history Channel aren't we
no scientist would ever agree with you that a missing link has been found
Cause there isn't any
@Puppet Master you do realize that that has little to do with this argument. We still know Humans are related to ostrolipithicus africanus
carbon 14 in dinosaur bones, soft tissue in fossils, no missing link
Well done @Puppet Master, you just advanced to level 6!
how do we know? i just looked it up and it says it is "thought" to be an ancestor
I.e. there is evidence
To support that conclusion
This is how primates and then humans developed
Pretty sure even homo habilis was ape like
So your ideas are still flawed
More than us definitely but he didn't look like one
ya looked into it they have no dna evidence or anything to prove it is our ancestor all they are going by is skull shape
Source?
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species/australopithecus-africanus
you did not even put a source for your claim that it was related
Australopithecus, (Latin: “southern ape”) (genus Australopithecus), group of extinct primates closely related to, if not actually ancestors of, modern human beings and known from a series of fossils found at numerous sites in eastern,
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Australopithecus
and was thought to have been a direct ancestor of modern humans. (key word is THOUGHT"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus_africanus
Thought for a reason moron
It says in the article
you said evidence
That I sent
you said WE KNOW
where is the evidence? a hunch is not evidence
Viable ancestor of the genus homo. Basically the scientists agree he's mostly our ancestor or similar to them
fucking idiot
It isn't a hunch.
seriously you can not back up your argument so you resort to "moron" "idiot"
then PROVE IT
Mr. Eternal AngloToday at 8:00 PM I.e. there is evidence To support that conclusion
WHERE?
Your own source says that it is most likely
just post it
SCOURCE plz
MOST LIKELY not definitively proven
I sent a link which talks a bit about it. Think for a second: why would it be believed if there wasn't any evidence?
I'll find more evidence if you insist
