read the part about fossil evidence

My post?

There is little fossil evidence for the divergence of the gorilla, chimpanzee and hominin lineages.[113] The earliest fossils that have been proposed as members of the hominin lineage are Sahelanthropus tchadensis dating from 7 million years ago, Orrorin tugenensis dating from 5.7 million years ago, and Ardipithecus kadabba dating to 5.6 million years ago. Each of these have been argued to be a bipedal ancestor of later hominins but, in each case, the claims have been contested. It is also possible that one or more of these species are ancestors of another branch of African apes, or that they represent a shared ancestor between hominins and other apes.

The question then of the relationship between these early fossil species and the hominin lineage is still to be resolved.

ha did they delete your post? @OrthoNinten

Probably won't

No they didn't

Because this whole thing is a hoax

Bruh missing link how retarded are you @Puppet Master watching too much history Channel aren't we

no scientist would ever agree with you that a missing link has been found

Cause there isn't any

@Puppet Master you do realize that that has little to do with this argument. We still know Humans are related to ostrolipithicus africanus

carbon 14 in dinosaur bones, soft tissue in fossils, no missing link

Well done @Puppet Master, you just advanced to level 6!

how do we know? i just looked it up and it says it is "thought" to be an ancestor

I.e. there is evidence

To support that conclusion

This is how primates and then humans developed

Pretty sure even homo habilis was ape like

So your ideas are still flawed

More than us definitely but he didn't look like one

ya looked into it they have no dna evidence or anything to prove it is our ancestor all they are going by is skull shape

Source?

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species/australopithecus-africanus

you did not even put a source for your claim that it was related

Australopithecus, (Latin: “southern ape”) (genus Australopithecus), group of extinct primates closely related to, if not actually ancestors of, modern human beings and known from a series of fossils found at numerous sites in eastern,

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Australopithecus

and was thought to have been a direct ancestor of modern humans. (key word is THOUGHT"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus_africanus

Thought for a reason moron

It says in the article

you said evidence

That I sent

you said WE KNOW

where is the evidence? a hunch is not evidence

Viable ancestor of the genus homo. Basically the scientists agree he's mostly our ancestor or similar to them

fucking idiot

It isn't a hunch.

seriously you can not back up your argument so you resort to "moron" "idiot"

then PROVE IT

Mr. Eternal AngloToday at 8:00 PM
I.e. there is evidence
To support that conclusion