to save his corrupt throne

do what sparta did and have 2 kings

Man I told you

No aristocrats

<:hitlerpepe:543956279056400396>

Let me correct you @Romulus Uzurpatorul

Only the man who deserves the throne

Aristocracy of spirit

every man an aristocrat

every man a king

@IliasSpook same shit for ancient rome

cringe as shit when libtards use these to push progressive agendas

Yea

Like I dont want some dumbass that gets money for being related to a long dead byzantine emperor come up to me and lead my country

omg guise muh open and tolerant ancientz

That is ridiculous

Well done @Romulus Uzurpatorul, you just advanced to level 5!

Pretty sure most romans actively hated the etruscans for being sexual degenerates

yet we ignore that and just call them gay

By that logic what is the point of having a King

Look

funny how even then they had peasant lynch mobs against faggots and other forms of taboo in those societoes

You establish yourself

As a dictator

And then

To preserve the system

You hand it over to your son

and it was mostly practiced by elites even in cases where it did happen

Wich would have been indoctrinated for the whole of his life

and what makes his children proper successors, leadership should be given to the most capable

the ancient greeks and various others were well aware it was disgusting and un-natural

And not given the benefits of being the child of an king

You can indoctrinate someone his whole life and he can still become and incompetent king

Because you teach them

Since they are little

You shape them into kings

made my point on this again I think

Teaching does nothing if their leadership skills are garbage

nothing else needs to be said

bruh

not every man can be a king