the nation

Again why not simply have the party pick a new leader

since the party members got there via meritocracy

@ΕΘΝΙΚH ΑΝΤΙΣΤΑΣΗ yes but I meant, Gods are known in ancient Greek lieterature for being material beings, they don't take an abstract form while in Christianity God for once went to Earth in a human form

because the party isnt the people

why not have the councils of cooperatives have to approve the new leader in order to avoid corruption

yes someone would need to approve the leader

the corporatives and syndicates are the voice of the people after all

not always

anyways

ofc there would be other higher ups that would need to approve the leader

yes like the top party leaders

yes

they have to approve also

but I simply prefer that to having the new leader being the son of the previous one

he can be if he earns it

but he doesnt have to be

well yes he would have to earn it

that is why he goes thru training

i think that after the king dies

the people would see if they want to re elect the house of whatever the king was , or another regular man

but that has its ups and downs

meritocracies always have an inherent bias

Well done @Kjarvalur, you just advanced to level 1!

they do

there's always going to be a bias in society, so make you society favour the natural elite over the burgeouise or the nobility

the people should choose are a regular man

whose grand father was like any other man

and his father same

so a cincinattus

i guess

well no that's cincinattus bruh

cincinattus was good tho

if said natural selection of the natural elite can occur mentally then it can be transplanted into reality, the directed (immaterial/action) meets the extended (material)

and a common man is so dumb and enlightenment tier shit

what's a 'common man'

working class?

fit around the confides of a burgeouise society

working class could be a good way to describe that person

but you see

other people