because fascism is naturally anti bourguasie

a king is literally just 1900s bourguasie

glorified one at that

Fascist more like nationalist

Wrong word

I sometimes use them interchangeably

a nationalist monarchy would just degenerate. What if they have one or two good kings if the rest are cringe in the end

>cringe

I mean look

Better have two lifetimes of nationalism than 1

Look at Romania, king Carol II and Mihai were retards

True

But

Ferdinand

United everyone

And no king ever really managed that

Except for Mihai

who cares about one if the rest are cringe. Rather have more good than cringe.

And Carol I was great

A dictator would make a way bigger power struggle

@Romulus Uzurpatorul Antonescu was a good dictator but he had problems with Sima and this is why the National Legionary State ended

As I am saying

Antonescu wasn't a politician

Power Struggle

There can be good monarchs but doesn't mean monarchy is an ideal system

If a monarchy is handled correctly

Good monarchs are the exceptions that define the rule

Then you might as well get great kings for many lifetimes

rather have 1000 years of golden age then 60 years of golden age

well yes

ofc

bruh

with some jump ins of golden ages

But sure no one lives 1000 years?

And sure nothing lasts

That much

Thats a shitty comparison to be honest, Im telling you

If you handled an elected monarchy carefully

no one lives 1000 years yes but our kids will. There are ways to keep shit from degenerating which would be cucked by kings

The world wont last 1000 more years tho

modern yes