Message from @Apollo
Discord ID: 640244128793231414
Then why bring it up in the first place?
I simply asked if you read it and mentioned the most used argument against it
Probably because I memed about it
People arguing against Siege are usually christians
People supporting siege are usually not
And NS too
People who support Siege are usually identitarian christians or pagans
@Traveler To be honest considering that siegers act as they he would have point to avoid the book
If not only for not being associated with it
Same could be said about Christians and how they act
Same about pagans tho
I tend to see more pagans acting like shitposters than Christians
Not a pagan
Didnt say you were
You a good muslim brotha
@Lord Catto No memes in walls of rome, you have been warned multiple times, this is the last one
@η αρετή Ενωχ move to <#604498949784469534>
Salus extra ecclesiam non est.
@Demetrios okay first of all Italians are aryans if we take the most logic definition of aryan
Aka indo european
Then who would be then non-aryan Italian fascists?
Your mom
@anthr0pos Somali colonials maybe?
Lol
Not italian
Italian insofar as under the rule of the Italian state
I agree that's not a good definition of nationhood but otherwise I don't really see who he can refer to
Not Italian if they're Somali they're not italian
Yeah I know
That's why I was asking
But he said there are specific famous figures
Can't think at anyone
Mussolini
Funny
I know
Also theoretically any race could adopt fascism with certain specifics being racially, as well nationally, unique, but I will say certain races are more prone to fascism than others, and it is directly correlated with the intelligence of the race I would say. Most niggers and other non-whites are too dumb, impulsive, and savage to be fascists (at least in anything but name) but it is not totally impossible for those higher on the bell curve of other races to adopt it.
Niggas have historically adopted fascism in specific occasions
I think every race could and should