Also "most X scientists believe Y" =/= "Y is thoroughly and quite unshakably proven"

Only hippies believing the far left are saying about an extinction

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/10/earths-sixth-mass-extinction-event-already-underway-scientists-warn

> Only hippies believing the far left are saying about an extinction
Really?

Yet the same hippies are doing everything they can to guarantee it gets worse

www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1704949114

Scientists reportedly admitted to getting their diplomas from cereal boxes, news at 11.

Most scientists may just believe Y because the science still has a long way to go and Y is just their best guess.

not a proven fact

Guardian seems pretty far left to me

But in seriousness

The guardian is reporting on fact..

Guardian is just a communist propaganda rag at this point

they also said NY would be deep underwater by 1989

This isn't the opinion section, this is the news section

that was from a UN report

I will read that but thats quite the problem with science, different people get different results we can’t just believe every scientist or else we’ll have conflicting opinions

>News

<:Doubt:588038713938804760>

You can't protect and rebuild habitat while you're building over it because you've allowed open border immigration

You don't have to disagree that global warming is real to disagree on the rediculous timescales

That have been claimed over the last few decades

Scientists also say everyday that trans people aren't actually biologically the gender they believe themselves to be, where's the report from the guardian on that one?

With most turning out to be wrong.

Global warming = real

Scientists also point out the gender wage gap is a myth, but guardian still reports it as fact

Timescale = most likely BS

Scientists also say that immigrant pee makes tap water taste like explosives, where's the guardian article about that?

The warming is pretty well documented. What isn't certain is the causes and their significance. Which in turn means that our prediction ability is very poor.

Anyway see ya in general now

If you actually took that seriously, you're genuinely fucking retarded, Nathan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change @leavethisbotnet

> Currently, there is a strong scientific consensus that the Earth is warming and that this warming is mainly caused by human activities.

"strong"

that's so fucking vague

The models are garbage because they grotesquely exagerate the forcing effect

>Doesn't understand the scientific community

how many?

majority?

Isn’t it funny these same journalists moaning about climate change drive on the motorway to work every morning in there car

> Nearly all publishing climate scientists (97–98%[1]) support the consensus on anthropogenic climate change,[2][3] and the remaining 3% of contrarian studies either cannot be replicated or contain errors.