Message from @P4GY
Discord ID: 642124638050058250
that infamous WSJ hit piece has probably made them the most money out of any article theyve had in the last decade
Yeah, but it damaged their credibility in quite a fundamental way
So, at what cost?
did it tho? or did it increase their profile
both
Was a jolly odd and out-of-character video tho
If a labour freak tries to tell you that the 1% need to pay more remind them that they control 21% of the wealth but provide 28% of the tax
They're actually over represented in the taxing as it is
interesting
But muh evil rich people - Lefties
I agree Jack
And there is no justification for any tax rate above 50%
There is scant justification for tax-free allowances
There's no justification for Income Tax.
Of course there is, silly
The state has power. That's the justification.
There's justification for income tax
Subtle BBC bias in their sub heading
Then when you scroll down, your whole argument evaporates
BBC are anti-brexit, however
When you look at that nice chart.
Looks like they answered the question right there in that chart doesn't it?
lol. Nick Conrad quit the Broadland race
He would have fucking walked it
lol @Nathan James 123 why do they bother including that though?
Read the article, it tells you what its for
everything else on that article thing is factual info about how the voting system works, then they just say that? i find it kinda weird lol
That is also factual.
Eccles I feel uncomfortable when you agree with me
They asked the question, do people care more about Brexit, or the NHS
Then they cite a source
Provided you're not rubbing my feet, we should be ok, Jack
Which shows Brexit.
yeah i saw that before i commented here lol
but gg idk i think thats weird to put that out their lol
It's not tbh
It's showing that this general election is Brexit orientated