So we're way past the point of that argument

[CULTURE]
OPENLOAD AND STREAMANGO STREAMING VIDEO SITES SHUT DOWN IN HOLLYWOOD PIRACY CRACKDOWN
> https://www.newsweek.com/openload-shut-down-streamango-pirate-video-streaming-1469157

I'm sure that's gonna reduce the amount of piracy /s

https://twitter.com/NickJFuentes/status/1190341068883148801

Charlie Kike about to get #MeToo'd

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

It'll just ramp up piracy more.

Take something down, 5 more comes back.

Something i never understood is that websites require money and i assume theyre not running these sites at a loss. The sites usually have hella ads. How does anybody advertise on a piracy site?

Cant they just go after your advertisers?

Probably easier than outright shutting you down.

I'm NOT eating bugs. 🕷️
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjsPpRZVrzQ

2019: People having sex with worms.

No-one's *forcing* you to, PJW.

Hey, I'm not eating haggis. You hear that Scottish SJWs! You cannot make me!

Fuck Greta as well.

Or no fuck. For a loli, she's rather ugly.

She's got the face of an adult tbh

must be the fetal alcohol syndrome

Jeremy's take on Death Stranding was quite poor and typical Jeremy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS3NYWhNrVo

There's a point to be made that all these review prior to game release are **access journalism** and none of them can be trusted.

But to go full Jeremy and use a couple 6/10 reviews (as if they were reliable) to make a conclusion... wew lad.

I think jeremy is a krapjima fangirl

Jeremy hasn't played the game, yet he reviewed the game without playing to 3/10 or 7/10 minus 7 (0/10).

The only thing worse than a bought review is a review from a guy who hasn't played it at all.

And I do understand the antipathy toward access "journalism" since they are practically just undisclosed advertisements (because if they review it to low rating, they won't get the next early access free copy. And the free part isn't even the problem but they wouldn't get it early, meaning their future review wouldn't have clicks/views on them. Access journalism is cancer.

(But somehow IGN is now god. Somehow.)

Also, I really cannot understand Jeremy's train of thought... he points out that reviewers who gave Mass Effect Andromeda (a notoriously bad game) perfect scores, are giving Death Stranding substandard scores. So... *are they the best reviewers now?* My brain doesn't do Jeremy logic.

Also, I find it funny that when reviewers bitched about Cuphead being too difficult, the reviewers were incompetent.
Now IGN complains that the game has too difficult gameplay model regarding maintaining balance while rock climbing... **and it's the game's fault**.

Jeremy has been getting on my nerves with the witcher

He keeps framing it as "Hur dur they are making the show more like the books *instead of* the games reee"

News flash, the story of the first game doesn't even begin until after the conclusion of the last book

Jeremy is a political "anti-political" hack.

I've got a pretty sensetive woke detector for trailers and I'm not even sensing much from the witcher trailers

So maybe the show is going to go into the game time period after a few seasons... but Jeremy still complains that it didn't start midway?

It's quite possible the show will be trash, but it doesn't look obvious just from the trailers

I think jeremy needs drama for clicks, which is sad

And I think people are going to make the mistake of judging the show without understanding the source material

For example half the books are told from the perspective of ciri, so if people are going to get up in arms about the show doing that and calling it woke... idk maybe you should blame the books for that