I'd think that if you're trying to subversively disseminate a new religion, it would require a network large enough that even if someone did a complete and fresh takeover, it'd be nigh impossible to do so without learning of the plan

Dunno, the truth is sometimes stranger than fiction

agreed

and a lot of the stuff we actually know about Jesus is from like the 2nd century AD iirc

to my knowledge, we don't have mention of a 'Jesus' from records of that time period

isn't Tacitus one of the first Roman accounts of Christianity?

I think so?

https://delacortereview.org/2019/11/04/what-do-we-do-with-robert-e-lee/

SJWs trying to poke the hornet's nest once again

There's going to come a day when this flips so hard, Hitler 2 mark boogaloo will come back in vengeance. Just an observation, not a statement of position, ***discord***

oh boi

this is gonna be one a spicy meatball https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI8SZXUF57Y

net neutrality was such a sham

in some ways, yes

not entirely tho

https://summit.news/2019/11/01/billboard-in-london-encourages-white-people-to-sterilize-themselves/

> Billboard in London Encourages White People to Sterilize Themselves

btw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyzwIcPw940

latter half of the vid

Styx correctly pins the stupidity of "Groypers"

inb4 <:salt:501105964758466586>

I've also called Groypers as a left-wing op. Because only the left benefits from spergs going after Trump fans within Republicans.

They're leaving the never Trumpers alone, and they're leaving the Democrats alone.

And I'm in no way a fan of Israel or globalism, but the alternatives (never-Trumpers Bushite style and Democrats) are even worse.

There are ways to critique Kirk being a shitty globalist that doesn't come of as "Debate this Holocaust denialist". If Groypers were fixated on topic of Kirk being shit (which he is on globalism and Israel) they would **NOT** ask to debate Fuentes.

Because "debate Fuentes" is barely better than "debate Spencer".

Also, it sounds a lot like: debate Sam Seder.

The Holocaust denial wasn’t even a point until you guys brought it up

That wasn’t even in the discussion to begin with

Or, debate Enoch, debate Allsup, etc. from days when Sargon entertained the spergs.

@snake **Does - not - matter**

Perception over reality.

Yeah yeah, you can just keep ignoring people

Kirk should debate the **topic**, not Fuentes.

I don't think anyone should embrace cancel culture

The left already does it

You guys were the first ones talking about “free speech, market place of ideas— only in the darkness!”