Message from @whiic
Discord ID: 641436030154833951
SJWs trying to poke the hornet's nest once again
There's going to come a day when this flips so hard, Hitler 2 mark boogaloo will come back in vengeance. Just an observation, not a statement of position, ***discord***
oh boi
this is gonna be one a spicy meatball https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI8SZXUF57Y
net neutrality was such a sham
in some ways, yes
not entirely tho
https://summit.news/2019/11/01/billboard-in-london-encourages-white-people-to-sterilize-themselves/
> Billboard in London Encourages White People to Sterilize Themselves
btw
latter half of the vid
Styx correctly pins the stupidity of "Groypers"
inb4 <:salt:501105964758466586>
I've also called Groypers as a left-wing op. Because only the left benefits from spergs going after Trump fans within Republicans.
They're leaving the never Trumpers alone, and they're leaving the Democrats alone.
And I'm in no way a fan of Israel or globalism, but the alternatives (never-Trumpers Bushite style and Democrats) are even worse.
There are ways to critique Kirk being a shitty globalist that doesn't come of as "Debate this Holocaust denialist". If Groypers were fixated on topic of Kirk being shit (which he is on globalism and Israel) they would **NOT** ask to debate Fuentes.
Because "debate Fuentes" is barely better than "debate Spencer".
Also, it sounds a lot like: debate Sam Seder.
The Holocaust denial wasn’t even a point until you guys brought it up
That wasn’t even in the discussion to begin with
Or, debate Enoch, debate Allsup, etc. from days when Sargon entertained the spergs.
Perception over reality.
Yeah yeah, you can just keep ignoring people
Kirk should debate the **topic**, not Fuentes.
I don't think anyone should embrace cancel culture
The left already does it
You guys were the first ones talking about “free speech, market place of ideas— only in the darkness!”
Kirk is on the losing side of the topic. He doesn't want to debate it, obviously.
“We need to have a conversation because without that we have war!”
But demanding "debate Fuentes" gives Kirk the option to reject it because of Fuentes **as a person**.
It gives him an easy path out of accepting critique.
So don’t debate him because he said some things you think is horrific?
Because of who he is as a person?
He's a nobody.
Who wants self-promotion.