Message from @Falco
Discord ID: 642185406703730691
thats actually something my friend does all the time
"Sealioning." <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
he will say 'people should just say 'i dont know' more often'
even if he will ask a question, i asnwer it
Sealioning is the peak lack of self-awereness, IMO.
Imagine calling out people who demand sources for "sealioning".
its like bad faith arguments
Oh, you aren't allowed to slander with impunity?
'you want proof? what you dont trust me? wow bad faith'
I mean, just look at the comic:
he asked me once 'we dont know why shizo people act different in different cultures'
i answered exactly why
Is you were the anti-sealion people (either man or woman), why wouldn't you be able to dismiss the sealion by **EXPLAINING**?
Instead they go on from day to the next, saying the wish not to prove their assertion.
Art imitates life.
Feminists tried to make a comic against GamerGate, but it only exposes the feminist mindset of lying with impunity.
i assumed by the context of the panels that she answered between the panels
Nope. She didn't.
That's the reason why sealioning is ridiculous concept.
and the fact hes just wearing her down until she changes her mind from the pestering and its fighting for the last word type deal
I have a feminist friend, and I have seen that any criticism of feminism gets brushed aside as if they're non issues or outliers.
This was an anti-GamerGate comic after all. Don't think it would make sense.
this is why the ethnats exist
because its weird how women and black people dont like using logic apparently
mostly because if they do, they dont get their way for free
like everyone else understands...
it took straight white people all of history to get to this point, and then in 1 lifetime, all the non-straight white men walk in like it was always here
id be pissed too
If you were the woman (or the man) in the comic, how would you deal with the sealion?
A) Explain why you don't like sealions.
B) Retract and apologize for lying, or say it was a joke or mistake or whatever.
C) Cry about someone demanding proof, sources or arguments as to why sealions are evil.
Because the people who think "sealioning" is a thing, think C) is valid way of proving your point.
i might say something, someone asks for proof, and i dont feel like going into it
because otherwise its probably an hour of time i had planned doin something else
could say 'well you shouldnt have brought up the possibility' but eh
I mean, I understand being kristiwinterized.
Meaning, someone asks proof of something self-evident, just to wear you down.
Like MSM has left-wing bias. Obvious, but difficult to prove since bias is not quantifiable in numbers, mathematics and scientific proof.
had that before
i said to a guy 'MSM, social media, and education are lefty as fuck'
"YouTube has a right-wing bias." -David Packman
and i linked him a twitter post of someone saying twitter was operated by nazis, because they were frustrated and quit the platform
and he was confused on why i was mocking it