How is USA **objectively** better than Saudi Arabia?

larger

Objectively includes also Islamic perspective.

you are robbing people of their agency.

the right way of living ones "life" is different for each person

Is larger objectively better?

Judeo-Christian teachings try to set people on a path of prosperity and inner happiness, divorced from physical materialism and with a strong moral compass (read: anti-nihilism). Which is why the Petersonian idea of reality works in Judeo-Christian cultures.

Larger is objectively larger

That which 'is real' *must* 'benefit you'

To reduce it

Greater country by mass

@Hexidecimark Well, I asked "How is USA objectively better than Saudi Arabia?", not about largeness.

So don't derail.

@D3bug_logic people have the agency to live their lives wrong though. Being wrong doesn't mean you can't do it, or it shouldn't.

Your question was stupid, ask a better one for a better answer

but it might benefit them to live their life wrong

"wrong"

I don't see how

If it does, then our definition of 'wrong' is wrong

how are you basing your measure? pleasure? meaning? security?

Prosperity and inner happiness

Essentially

Which, yes, are vague

Hence the problem

This is why I prefer the Aristotelian conception of ethics and 'how one ought to live'

exactly you are getting to the point these hard truths cannot be black and white right from wrong

No, I believe they can, but as Aristotle would say, any real science can only be as accurate as the real world allows.

some things might work in the short term, but fail in the long term

Then they're not as 'right' as they could be

that is jb petersons defintion of truth

I'm not even sure if I dare to listen to this because I'm uncertain if Harris offers any pushback to insanity of Marantz.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oHbqeLDlLY

In topic of "race and IQ" Harris can have debate and pushback, but on topic of "Alt-Right" and Trump, they guy is just as deluded and insane as worst of regressives are.

Which is ironic because Sargon is the polar opposite for example... but he wouldn't touch "race and IQ" with a ten feet pole.

If you don't know who Marantz is, he's the target of this mockery: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Le8YwQ6ZS4

Have yall seen the "maths ethinc studies" akkad daily vid? Anyone else think that truly is the peak of lunacy, claiming mathematics is inherently white supremacy and oppressive to minorities? Because i am really, *really* struggling to think of something more *derp* than this....

Let them teach their own retarded maths for all I care.

It's their kids who'll be retarded.

However, I don't think they're at peak yet.

@Lupinate Well, calling mathematics white supremacy is kinda true, if you understand "race and IQ". Niggers are dumb as fuck.

SJW: Math is racist!!!

Teichmuller: Yes