D:

i dont blame you

but it would be easier to have the discussion

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/246002575273492481/635975163975827536/SPOILER_kvYu0GI.png

without making moral claims - the way stuff worked these couple hundred of years worked out in such a way we would like to continue rather than remove everything

I mean

Cause thats the entire fundamental element of your doctrine. Rich stealing from poor. So we must seize the means and give it back to the people by taking from the rich and giving it to the poor. Or taking the engine that fuels the economy and do it that way.

maybe a one on one talk?

if not its cool

This conversation isn't really worth it anymore

no hard feelings

Your literally' just making a morale claim in the avenue you want to take.

being the stance of a communist

hey its cool if you like your echo chamber

it seems warm and cozt

cozy

And its cool if you like yours too

@Tea Pope so why dont we both step out

@ubermensch >morale

and have a discussion

?

We have been for the past 40 mins

>jack of trades

>jack

u gae

And it got nowhere

@Tea Pope voice is alot easier to get points across

So I give up

@svarozhyc ye

okay fair enough

jack gae agenda

agaenda

Jack's globohomo agenda

Jackstein

enjoy this debate now ;3

@livid_scrooge it only includes you 😘

Thank you Jack

https://youtu.be/vmhjhA-l0gg

Again tell me why else do you make the distinctions like personal and private property amongst the communist perspective? If your entire objective isn't to take shit from people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORYVCML8xeE

Everybody's goal is to take shit from others see