Message from @Boop / 브파 / C'thUwU
Discord ID: 625083450273169408
That’s based off of a fucked up interpretation of the 14th amendment
The courts could easily fix that
k python -- to clarify what weez just said .... *as things stand right now*, you can't.
also, at this point, given the longevity of the precedence involved, you'd basically need a new amendment to change that (as a practical matter).
Yeah that’s true
I mean it’s correct the establishment is not working for us anyway
I think it’s going to fall apart
(i can't find it right now, but ....) i was watching a talk given by anthony scalia wherein he talked about various considerations when overturning precedence; and apparently it is considered "good law" to balance how __disruptive__ overturning something will be.
such as, if a particular <thing> has been in place for <some indeterminately "long time"> such that society has built itself around *that* particular interpretation, and changing that would "unduly disrupt" society, then the "right" decision is to leave it in place.
(don't know that i agree with that; but it is what it is)
iow, u'd need an actual amendment to change it
That's a pretty terrible way of doing things
Intentionally slowing progress down
No no silly, just changing the direction of progress.
"progress"
a)that seems to assume that rejecting precedence only goes in 1 direction
lol
b) the point is that you can't just go around ripping out long-standing ways of being *in 1 fell swoop*
i completely agree with the sentiment; i just don't think that i'd call it "good law"
u can have change (or "progress", lol) without destabilizing society in the process
yo i was thinking that the only way to fix demographics in the UK shall be taxing the non naturals for every 3rd kid, the 4rth kid like 60% more expensive and so on.
or removing every aid from the 3rd kid... or some shit like that.
some way to discourage the "tourists with expenses paid" from having 10 F kids.
<:powerful:595334910764515338>
its better to incentivize rather than penalize
and you cant give different rules to different races because obviously
i do not see the "obviously"
things may change.
youre taxing people based on ethnicity
you cant do that
its political suicide
and youre just asking for an ethnostate
isn't he taxing people based on no.of kids?
natural borns
well, if ethnostate means that all europe will not become south africa... <:hyperthink:462282519883284480>
<:xethno:522941537647329280>
what you do is the natural borns are still the majority
was just a thought tho... i know that can result barbaric some how... but i think that equilibrium is exential
so if baby making is evened out, you eventually have more natural borns than not
hitler said similar things
youre going for policy based on race being an essential factor of something
Nothing wrong with that, plenty of policies are based on race
the problem is not race
is education