Message from @ETBrooD
Discord ID: 625096713849536512
This is why even progeny of high IQ immigrants regress to the racial mean
Because whatever changes they receive from controlling environmental factors are "hollow for g"
In other words, only their skill is increasing, not general intelligence
IQ can also be trained by practicing the thought patterns that are required to achieve higher scores in IQ tests
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/iq-boot-camp/201605/new-evidence-iq-can-be-increased-brain-training
"Relational skill" is not to be mistaken with social skills, it just means stuff like if A > B then B < A etc.
Which subtests did they use?
idk, I haven't purchased the paper
It is of course possible to "train" for low heritability subtests, as it is possible to train to use Photoshop
But the main point about IQ tests are high heritability subtests
i was watching the clip from People's Veto , seems very interesting
Which are the main source for infering about g factor and, in turn, racial gaps
The point is just that IQ is a mixture of genetics, environment and training
No shit
Congrats on finding something apriori
Yeah but people who say that genetics is number one lack the evidence for that, that's why I'm saying this
That no one here contested
Well when someone says 80% is genetics, they do kinda contest it
and since we cant change genetics, and we dont need everyone to be equal in IQ at 130 or some shit....
How? @ETBrooD
What do you think the rest 20% is?
It isn't
It's all inferred from research
There's a lot of research to the contrary, you can choose to believe that number is accurate, but it makes no sense to believe that
LMAO
Do you even read before you post nonsense
?
It of course "makes sense" as far as the data indicates it does
And of course there exist many studies
Hence you take a meta analysis
Only if you select your data specifically to support the 80%
Not a single study
Have you read the numbers from the link I posted?
>muh huwhite man manipulating data
lul
You're clearly I'll equipped to have this conversation
"My data is not manipulated, not biased, and conclusive, but yours is not"
@ETBrooD That's why we do a meta analysis you dumbfuck
Ad homs win all arguments
Meta analysis literally means an aggregate of various studies