There's a lot of research to the contrary, you can choose to believe that number is accurate, but it makes no sense to believe that

LMAO

Do you even read before you post nonsense

?

It of course "makes sense" as far as the data indicates it does

And of course there exist many studies

Hence you take a meta analysis

Only if you select your data specifically to support the 80%

Not a single study

Have you read the numbers from the link I posted?

>muh huwhite man manipulating data

lul

You're clearly I'll equipped to have this conversation

"My data is not manipulated, not biased, and conclusive, but yours is not"

@ETBrooD That's why we do a meta analysis you dumbfuck

Ad homs win all arguments

Meta analysis literally means an aggregate of various studies

It's not an ad hom if it also contains a rebuttal

If you want to debate me learn to be civil

Saying you're a dumbfuck would be ad hom

Saying "you should read about meta analysis you dumbfuck" isn't an ad hom

LMFAO

Sure sure

https://youtu.be/BHfYrYjpiJg

@Boop / 브파 / C'thUwU @Mr. Robo`tó Check this debate out

You're wrong on every level cause your sources are bad you grandma-sniffing Biden clone

Fuck off back to oblivion you absolute retarded mongoloid

That's also not an ad hom right?

Like, it can't be

You started it by saying "fuck off blabla etc." so it's not an ad hom

Focus on the point you literal troglodyte

> you grandma-sniffing Biden clone
> absolute retarded mongoloid

I'm booing you off the stage. Get better material.

I am gonna focus on the point when you stop sniffing farts you dirty old fucksock

Saying "muh biased sources" and "look at this lone study from Siberia" isn't an argument when I'm presenting literal met analysis

You literal dimwit troglodyte

It's funny when everything I say can't be considered ad hom according to your logic

I'm being perfectly civil rn

You don't even know what is a meta analysis

Holy shit

LMFAO

Cute