And should pedophiles be able to sleep w who they want?

I mean

It’s oppressive

yeah i'm not entertaining nonsensical whataboutism

It’s not, it’s a legitimate question

you seem intelligent, you are however embarrassing yourself

It’s oppressive to control who ppl sleep w, therefore let pedos sleep w kids

It’s the logical conclusion

Is it not?

@British Cigarette how did you come to that conclusion ?

That is going from 1 to 10000 in lightspeed.

If it’s oppressive to control who you sleep with, then it is also oppressive to control who everyone sleeps with

Everyone includes pedophiles, correct?

Therefore let them do what they want

Ez clap s,h

How is having age of concent and anti pedo laws "oppressive" ?

Ask @OneTrueGod

smh, shaking my head so fast it has twisted clean off and is now spinning on my desk, it shows no signs of slowing down and has formed an accretion disc, this will turn into a black hole and kill us all

Ok then...

This is getting a bit strange to say the least.

@OneTrueGod k

Why can you not make a counter argument?

because you will stretch everything to an extreme without applying common sense lady

goodnight

K

I'd say @British Cigarette has successfully demonstrated that "it's oppressive" is not an argument

The point of that exercise doesn't seem to be to excuse pedophilia, but to question the legitimacy of unchecked abortion

Since both (the stopping of pedophilia and the stopping of abortion) require force to be applied in real life, and thus can be argued are both oppressing some people, therefore the act of oppressing an act itself isn't neccessarily immoral

Wait is that what you've all been arguing over all day? Whether stopping people from fucking children is fascist?
Paedophiles get the bullet too

That part of the argument was about abortion. They were talking about a few things, not just one thing.

The argument on the part of @OneTrueGod was that preventing abortion is oppressive, so @British Cigarette brought up the comparison to another act that is being oppressed to demonstrate that "it's oppressive" is not an argument

And I'd say his counter argument that this reasoning is "whataboutism" is invalid because the point of bringing up the pedophilia argument was to demonstrate a flaw in the "it's oppressive" argument, not to deflect from it

Basically whataboutism is when someone says "shit happens" and the rebuttal is "but worse shit happens, too"

But that is not what the rebuttal was

I advocate mandatory abortions for black people.