I don't know how it became an issue either

This debate is a confused mess.

Original guy I pinged was talking w another guy about fucking 12 year olds

That’s how

@British Cigarette WHAT !?!

But just because “everyone is doing it” doesn’t mean it’s right @OneTrueGod

I mean like

They talked about hoe in certain countries age of consent is 12

Therefore lolicon good?

I forget

There was a sexual revolution, women got free agency, more than they ever did have in the 30's, they are doing what they want with that agency, and now they can't?, yeah no, stop trying to control who people want to sleep with, its opressive

Do you want to control if women get abortions?

and no I don't mean child brides in the third world

no i don't, wtf

And should pedophiles be able to sleep w who they want?

I mean

It’s oppressive

yeah i'm not entertaining nonsensical whataboutism

It’s not, it’s a legitimate question

you seem intelligent, you are however embarrassing yourself

It’s oppressive to control who ppl sleep w, therefore let pedos sleep w kids

It’s the logical conclusion

Is it not?

@British Cigarette how did you come to that conclusion ?

That is going from 1 to 10000 in lightspeed.

If it’s oppressive to control who you sleep with, then it is also oppressive to control who everyone sleeps with

Everyone includes pedophiles, correct?

Therefore let them do what they want

Ez clap s,h

How is having age of concent and anti pedo laws "oppressive" ?

Ask @OneTrueGod

smh, shaking my head so fast it has twisted clean off and is now spinning on my desk, it shows no signs of slowing down and has formed an accretion disc, this will turn into a black hole and kill us all

Ok then...

This is getting a bit strange to say the least.

@OneTrueGod k

Why can you not make a counter argument?

because you will stretch everything to an extreme without applying common sense lady

goodnight

K

I'd say @British Cigarette has successfully demonstrated that "it's oppressive" is not an argument

The point of that exercise doesn't seem to be to excuse pedophilia, but to question the legitimacy of unchecked abortion

Since both (the stopping of pedophilia and the stopping of abortion) require force to be applied in real life, and thus can be argued are both oppressing some people, therefore the act of oppressing an act itself isn't neccessarily immoral