wow, bid oof

I mean I'm on the trump train and all but I've always respected Gabbard

She's right on this count

It's frankly a shame she's running DNC.

She'd be a terrifying Republican

If she really wants it though she'll run independent when the DNC places Biden over her

If she really wants it she'll stand down after the DNC makes their choice and then try again in 2024 after the DNC candidate looses to trump

Yeah, I hear/agree.

Either way, she'll need to quit the Army if/when she gets the nomination.

because her running as an indi will split the vote between her and dem loyalists

She won't run independent.

She doesn't want to pull a Perot.

and after that the DNC will never let her run as a dem again

@Goodwood of Dank™ was that in response to me or sadcat?

Trump ran as a Democrat in 2000.

Sadcat.

Both, actually.

I got the impression from her Rubin interview that she doesn't want to run independent.

For a number of reasons, really. First, I think she hopes to prove to Democrats that the DNC is trash.

I was saying why it's a tactically bad discussion to run as an indi for her

Second, I think she fully understands what damage could be caused by going independent.

Yeah, I agree.

Sorry if I was restating your thoughts.

I think it will split more libertarian and republican/conservative vote if she ran as independent

Who'd otherwise have voted for Trump

She's still be blamed by Dems for ruining it for them, even if she took more votes away from Trump.

Dems are seeking external sources to blame for their mistakes. Just like 2016.

I love how PJW is "triggered" but he himself is not (while calling everyone he doesn't like a nazi): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Clv55fPcnqA

Why is the single word "Modernity." to express (I assume) disappointment the same as triggered?

It was literally just one word without even an exclamation mark.

Also, the least brave twerker in that room is more brave than the most heroic war veteran or something like that. How much more of a feminist cuck can you get? What "bravery" is to twerk in what you thought to be a private setting (with only other twerking libshits in the room)?

Also, I'm pretty sure people don't twerk for physical exercise. There's better physical exercise than twerking. You learn to twerk to twerk for others (non-discriminatingly as twerking is an area-effect action, unlike asking an individual for a coffee). It's a mating call (offered to everyone). People who want to learn that shit want that kind of thing, most likely with multiple partners and people that are strangers to them. How should that not effect your chances of being able to form a **stable** relationship?

First, men have the right to discriminate in partner selection just like women have. And even if men became total cucks like Vaush, and rejected having any preferences against women who don't show signs of being capable of exclusive relationships, the women who are into that shit are probably *from their side alone* too far gone to choose proper partners, friend-zoning the only ones who might be "nice guys" that they claim they want.

I just find if weird how the left *pretends* to not know connections between twerking and sexual flaunting. It's just like with the pole dancing being sold to preteens (or their parents as they have the money) as "not a sexual thing". Yeah. Totally just acrobatics and nothing to do with drug-infested strip clubs.

When people don't just learn to twerk at home but go to a school or gym to learn to do it, it is weird and against any sense of normalcy. It's like forming a group-masturbation session to circle-jerk in the literal sense. And that just doesn't happen.

And I think the biggest irony is that PJW didn't call for banning, just shunned it. Even if we were to take it as uncharitably as possible, i.e dogwhistling for authoritarianism on the subject, even then it would make PJW **only as bad as the leftwing provably is** (and the left doesn't even need to dogwhisle their intentions).

And as for "performative masculinity" being more prevalent than female public sexual flaunting.... I doubt that is true (considering women flaunt even passively, though clothing). But even if we took that as true, that catcalling, dogwhistling, grabbing their nuts in public, asking for blowjobs, or expressing how much they'd like to fuck, etc. was more prevalent than slutty clothing and twerking is for women, **that short of thing is in #metoo category**, it will get men destroyed in society... even 30 years later from when it happened (or even if there's no proof it did).

I'm just wondering: how can you be as detached from any understanding of reality as Vaush is?

That brave twerk warrior twerked PJW's eyesocket

Vaush is a over weight soy boy shit lib. The most annoying element of his personality is this childishness he has, he’ll try making his opponents look stupid, but just sounds like giddy high school bitch

I’ve seen him trying to respond to literature devil

And it’s just retarded and annoying

They guy said multiple things that were stupid