Message from @SnowPirate67
Discord ID: 622942913344700418
nope. i care not
truly a scientific method
@ManAnimal I have to agree with that
for science!
for the people who are still alive
I am suprised no one ever points out that any legal argument against seccesion is completely retarded as the MOMENT a state decides to leave, the Federal Gov HAS no legal standing to even make an argument
Yeah but they cannot succeed though. You need 2/3rds ratification by the states to do so
That won’t happen
If it is MY house and my kid gets kicked out cause a new gov takes over, he can't sue for being evicted lol
No one is willing to break the status quo
They don’t because there’s nothing addressing the issue explicitly. Most of it is implied post-fact.
the point is, 'rules' only MATTER if you have the abilty and the WILL to ENFORCE the rules
otherwise, they are just words on a page
Guess who has the monopoly on force?
The state
incorrect
the Federal Gov
And if the rule exists in the first place to actually be enforced. There’s no legal boundary that says a state cannot leave the Union, meaning that secession was perfectly within the legal authority of the states.
Did you not just hear what I said?
I WISH the State had the monopoly
pay attention, the discussion is about STATE'S rights
When I refer to “the State” that is what is the govt
After all, any powers not explicitly given to the federal government are assumed to be the power the states and citizens hold respectively.
the State is not the Federal Gov in this context
what 'you refer to' in your head, we cannot know
pay attention to context
The state is the smaller political entity; a region.
For example, Connecticut is a state.
we know this, but the two statements are incompatible
false dichotomy
Mao was woke af
Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.".
"State has monopoly on force" - this is NOT the same usage as 'Pennsylvania is a State"
same word
two different meanings
and we were using the second
this man speaks the truth
@Uksio same, but for Virginia.
Again as political argument the State refers to whoever is in charge as a political entity. Doesn’t mean local or otherwise