That's fine

But how can they choose someone for the most important job, basically a higher position than their own, without anyone voting for it?

Direct democracy sounds like a complete nightmare.

we the people give them that power

by voting for them

to become goverment

Yes, but you don't vote for the actual commissioners

how is this not democratic

There is a layer of representation which is redundant

Again, I'm saying if there were 5 layers or 12 layers, what would be the line where it would not be okay?

Like a person that chooses a person who chooses a person who chooses a person...

dunno how many times i can say the same thing tbh

https://feen.us/8q6s96.gif

So you'd be fine with 3 or 4 layers of choosing?

i m fine with the system as is

voting for the commisioner wouldnt be bad

but still

Why wouldn't it be better for the president/PM to propose a few commissioners and the people to vote for the person they want to represent them?

we can change anything we dont like moving forward

I think we should just have a world war

yes tbh

and nuke britain

Greeks are jealous of the UK

LMAO

Rather live in Chatham than Crete

Also, the people who are directly voted for by the people can't propose laws

they can ammend them

and change em

What about repeal them?

dunno tbh

got to do research

I don't think so

You do understand how that's a problem tho?

This whole thing about appointing people rather than electing them creates an atmosphere of cronies and buddies

And when you can't propose legislation, just vote on it / amend it, you basically have a system where the Commissioners/cronies can keep proposing what they want until it gets passed and then never talk about it again

and then you have the countries that dont like it

veto it

and its done

NO YOU CAN'T DO THAT

NO

Can the PM/president veto it?