Message from @UnfilteredGarbage

Discord ID: 626401085082435614


2019-09-25 12:52:27 UTC  

It wouldn't be able to increase its processing power but it could do more with less

2019-09-25 12:52:33 UTC  

Depends on the question your asking for it to serve

2019-09-25 12:52:35 UTC  

Depends what the purpose it wants is

2019-09-25 12:52:38 UTC  

He kinda slaps most other politicians out the water, even trump tbh

2019-09-25 12:52:44 UTC  

The purpose is relative

2019-09-25 12:52:49 UTC  

Garbage, networked systems aren't confined to their own local hardware

2019-09-25 12:52:51 UTC  

But if we build it on a quantum computer then it might as well have endless processing power

2019-09-25 12:52:53 UTC  

I'm a misanthrope. That's pretty much all the logic I need.

2019-09-25 12:53:01 UTC  

Someone use the stamps example on him please

2019-09-25 12:53:01 UTC  

@Samaritan™
Artifical Intelligence
is not
magic

2019-09-25 12:53:07 UTC  

Yes retard

2019-09-25 12:53:12 UTC  

Now shut the fuck up

2019-09-25 12:53:19 UTC  

Neither is natural intelligence

2019-09-25 12:53:28 UTC  

Neither is logic lol

2019-09-25 12:53:36 UTC  

It just is

2019-09-25 12:53:37 UTC  

Nothing I have said is beyond the realms of possibility

2019-09-25 12:53:42 UTC  

And it can become anything

2019-09-25 12:53:44 UTC  

Well yeah, it's only real magic if you're a spontaneous caster. Then you need Wisdom or Charisma.

2019-09-25 12:53:51 UTC  

@Eccles only a hyper retard would allow a learning AI unchecked access to other computers in a network

2019-09-25 12:54:16 UTC  

Don't put it beyond the Russians.

2019-09-25 12:54:16 UTC  

Since you need to control what a learning AI is exposed to in order to facilitate expedient learning

2019-09-25 12:54:18 UTC  

It will have to released into the real world eventually

2019-09-25 12:54:23 UTC  

So again it’s based on humans who build it

2019-09-25 12:54:26 UTC  

Someone please kill me

2019-09-25 12:54:32 UTC  

Or a destructive misanthrope. Once again, do not trust me with creating an AI.

2019-09-25 12:54:32 UTC  

They'll have their AI version of Chernobyl.

2019-09-25 12:54:33 UTC  

And why should we innately trust the people who build it

2019-09-25 12:54:51 UTC  

A controlled AI is just as bad as an uncontrolled one can you imagine what the gov would use it for

2019-09-25 12:54:57 UTC  

handy visual

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/613767975614283832/626401247804522519/image0.jpg

2019-09-25 12:55:03 UTC  

Here read these 10 million emails and find me the good shit

2019-09-25 12:55:07 UTC  

They'd use it for the exact same thing China's using it for

2019-09-25 12:55:19 UTC  

Information and Social control

2019-09-25 12:55:23 UTC  

Which is, yes, horrible

2019-09-25 12:55:28 UTC  

Uh huh

2019-09-25 12:55:35 UTC  

At least we can agree that's what they'd use it for

2019-09-25 12:55:37 UTC  

“It’s at least **decades** away”

2019-09-25 12:55:37 UTC  

That'd be my base issue. There's a certain agreement that almost a grand majority of humanity should agree upon how and why an AI is built and instructed

2019-09-25 12:55:38 UTC  

And when does it decide to control its master?

2019-09-25 12:55:41 UTC  

But the doomsday scenario where the AI comes online and just nukes everyone to death is retarded

2019-09-25 12:55:50 UTC  

That is

2019-09-25 12:55:56 UTC  

Unless I were to make it alone