Message from @Weez

Discord ID: 626407471807856640


2019-09-25 13:15:37 UTC  

There are people still doing that

2019-09-25 13:15:45 UTC  

Improving it

2019-09-25 13:15:45 UTC  

Evolving it, even

2019-09-25 13:16:01 UTC  

Last one I saw was quad-core

2019-09-25 13:16:02 UTC  

I should check in on that at some point

2019-09-25 13:16:13 UTC  

Holy shit they advanced from when I last saw it

2019-09-25 13:16:15 UTC  

tmw you can play CS:GO on Minecraft, and not as some shitty mod

2019-09-25 13:16:29 UTC  

The future is now old man

2019-09-25 13:16:35 UTC  

Lmao no, Java will never run efficiently enough for that

2019-09-25 13:16:40 UTC  

FPGA is cool

2019-09-25 13:16:50 UTC  

Guys. We've never seen it until now
Minecraft is the weapon to surpass Metal Gear

2019-09-25 13:17:07 UTC  

Minecraft 2

2019-09-25 13:18:15 UTC  

<a:UltimatePower:580191005622403083>

2019-09-25 13:18:19 UTC  

Can I get you a reading list?

2019-09-25 13:18:34 UTC  

A list of what? @lunemarie

2019-09-25 13:18:41 UTC  

AI sources

2019-09-25 13:18:58 UTC  

Ai is gay

2019-09-25 13:19:07 UTC  

Learn about propaganda and military theory

2019-09-25 13:19:23 UTC  

Most of the AI debate is fearmongering

2019-09-25 13:19:34 UTC  

Well, not really

2019-09-25 13:19:39 UTC  

It's theory

2019-09-25 13:19:41 UTC  

It isn't its just talking about the possibilities

2019-09-25 13:19:47 UTC  

I have 16 pages of sources

2019-09-25 13:19:48 UTC  
2019-09-25 13:20:18 UTC  

It's theory that's inflamatory. Meanwhile, China is abusing AI to do real-world societal harm and people don't make a sound

2019-09-25 13:20:39 UTC  

China didn’t need AI for that...

2019-09-25 13:20:50 UTC  

No, but they have it and they're using it

2019-09-25 13:20:58 UTC  

The Great Firewall uses almost no AI and look at that

2019-09-25 13:21:14 UTC  

I say almost because I haven’t checked in about a year

2019-09-25 13:21:14 UTC  

Its only inflammatory to your sensibilities and we don't have real AI yet

2019-09-25 13:21:32 UTC  

Wow so your saying those that make the tool ultimately shape its purpose? You don’t say.

2019-09-25 13:21:56 UTC  

I think they're just romanticising a lot

2019-09-25 13:22:03 UTC  

The discussion about current level and hypothetical level AI are two different things entirely

2019-09-25 13:22:15 UTC  

Hypothetical being?

2019-09-25 13:22:19 UTC  

Salient and compelling emotional response

2019-09-25 13:22:21 UTC  

@ubermensch that's a more meaningful position than "AIs will turn us into the matrix" , which is about the level of thought the general public are on

2019-09-25 13:22:43 UTC  

AI will do whatever we tell them, sadly

2019-09-25 13:22:55 UTC  

And when we tell them what we want they’ll deliver, sadly

2019-09-25 13:23:03 UTC  

They want to talk about the kind of AI have while we where talking about the kind of AI that would be so smart it'd have very high level philosophical thinking of its own

2019-09-25 13:23:13 UTC  

Imagine putting someone with a 300 IQ to work on one problem

2019-09-25 13:23:25 UTC  

It’d be like that