Message from @Laucivol

Discord ID: 598941895711784981


2019-07-11 18:08:04 UTC  

Wait.. so he mighta (psychologically) hurt a group of people that have, individually, performed what's generally considered a monstrous act?

2019-07-11 18:09:01 UTC  

The contempt thing is understandable.. but.. look.. we're talking about a series of individuals that have given up their rights by violating *children*.

2019-07-11 18:11:33 UTC  

I'm just trying to get my head around that one.

2019-07-11 18:13:13 UTC  

(Things about the entire "inalienable rights" concept is that, whilst they are inherent they can be relinquished by violating other's rights.)

2019-07-11 18:13:45 UTC  

Of course, my lense is singularly US.. so..

2019-07-11 18:14:49 UTC  

@King Canuck let's say he is. His anger and actions were righteous. This is unjust

2019-07-11 18:15:07 UTC  

@Laucivol how is it understandable?

2019-07-11 18:17:29 UTC  

@Jack of Trades oh I think his anger is just, his actions you can argue, but he doesn't deserve what he's been getting

2019-07-11 18:17:32 UTC  

can we agree there?

2019-07-11 18:18:12 UTC  

Of course

2019-07-11 18:18:26 UTC  

I don't care if he's dumb, he's right

2019-07-11 18:18:42 UTC  

Matter of concept- I don't know the details of the case.. just that the idea of contempt of court is reasonable.

2019-07-11 18:18:46 UTC  

He's doing all he knows how and he's being unjustly treated and it sickens me

2019-07-11 18:19:01 UTC  

@Laucivol In this case I don't agree

2019-07-11 18:19:34 UTC  

Again, was aiming at the idea, not that if he was or was not is correct or incorrect.

2019-07-11 18:20:14 UTC  

@Laucivol don't care

2019-07-11 18:20:16 UTC  

I'm talking super high level, not the details (as admitted I have not done the homework on it, so am not commenting on it).

2019-07-11 18:20:56 UTC  

That's fine, not interested in that. It's trivial

2019-07-11 18:21:00 UTC  

O R A N G E H O R S E B A D !

2019-07-11 18:21:13 UTC  

@Goodwood of Dank™ I'm out of weed ;^;

2019-07-11 18:21:15 UTC  

The underpinnings of law is trivial. K

2019-07-11 18:21:23 UTC  

Awww, poor foal.

2019-07-11 18:21:40 UTC  

@Laucivol that's an uncharitable interpretation. I care even less now

2019-07-11 18:21:54 UTC  

Indeed.

2019-07-11 18:23:38 UTC  

Truth is no more uncharitable than your own response. Which is fine, but I'm still stuck on the idiocy of the latter charge.

2019-07-11 18:24:39 UTC  

*eyeroll*

2019-07-11 18:25:42 UTC  

I see we have an accord.

2019-07-11 18:32:55 UTC  

o

2019-07-11 18:53:12 UTC  

"DOJ insider"

2019-07-11 18:53:16 UTC  

>Disregarded

2019-07-11 18:55:23 UTC  

is it me or is twitter completely broken ?

2019-07-11 18:55:46 UTC  

I was about to ask that

2019-07-11 18:55:50 UTC  

That implies it wasn't at some point

2019-07-11 18:55:52 UTC  

Was twitter ever intact?

2019-07-11 18:56:05 UTC  

lol i cant even acces my account all i get is this

2019-07-11 18:56:14 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598761542200197120/598950689854586887/unknown.png

2019-07-11 18:56:42 UTC  

i had to make a second account because when i log into my first one i just get locked into an infinite loop of errors

2019-07-11 18:56:44 UTC  

You got blocked from your own account

2019-07-11 18:56:46 UTC  

and i can't even log out