Message from @ebinmemes22
Discord ID: 599314283624530009
Trump could probably do some damage if he told his following to attack a group or something.
For example.
Trump wouldn't 'do the damage'
incitement present imminent threat
the reason it's considered illegal is because you have a right to self-defense
only those who acted upon his words would 'do'
the words *in* the incitement themselves are not illegal
words don't harm
actions do
MA just wants to be able to get away with punching whoever says anything he doesn't like
it's the context that presents a threat that does
WHAT?
I guess Hitler isn't responsible for the jew exterminations then
He only asked for it after all
i never said anything of the sort
the direct opposite in fact
well, that seems to be the subtext
if one commits and ACTION, that can be a crime
>implying the holohoax happened
punching is an ACTION
So is Hitler 100% innocent MA
but words aren't an action
but muh incitement
After all Hitler just spoke a bunch
<:thunk:462282216467333140>
Hitler didn't kill the jews but he should have
^
fine, destroy the freedoms you fought to protect
Tfw MA has successfully argued Hitler's innocence
The holodomor was an astral projection, the eskimos did 9/11
Those that don't understand history are doomed to repeat it
You're the repeater
and those who can't define their terms are doomed to be laughed at
Even the British understood incitement was bad at the time of the witch trials lol.
First, stigmitaize 'terror' so that even parents disciplining their kids of fathers fighting to protect their families are considered 'dangerous'
Of course
MA acts like he's 500iq when he's really 50iq
then, empower the crybullies, convincing the state to displace fathers in the family and community
Manmanmanman