Message from @wotmaniac
Discord ID: 599314065126588416
this is a post-modernist idea
If you're not going to tell us, we're going to just operate on the assumption that you're full of shit
actions are crimes; not words
unless of course, people don't have a CHOICE to simply ignore those words
What is Post modernism
Except that cults of personality are a thing and popular people can convince others to act to their wants/need.
legitimizing that idea, just arms the Left and encourages the state to be more and more intrusive
@SageTheory just ignore him he's full of shit
remember, "those willing to trade liberty for security..."
this is such a trade-off
Incitement has never been protected under the 1st amendment
Trump could probably do some damage if he told his following to attack a group or something.
For example.
Trump wouldn't 'do the damage'
incitement present imminent threat
the reason it's considered illegal is because you have a right to self-defense
only those who acted upon his words would 'do'
the words *in* the incitement themselves are not illegal
words don't harm
actions do
it's the context that presents a threat that does
WHAT?
I guess Hitler isn't responsible for the jew exterminations then
He only asked for it after all
i never said anything of the sort
the direct opposite in fact
well, that seems to be the subtext
if one commits and ACTION, that can be a crime
>implying the holohoax happened
punching is an ACTION
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
So is Hitler 100% innocent MA
but words aren't an action
but muh incitement
After all Hitler just spoke a bunch
<:thunk:462282216467333140>
Hitler didn't kill the jews but he should have
^
fine, destroy the freedoms you fought to protect
Tfw MA has successfully argued Hitler's innocence