Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 599314095006547989
actions are crimes; not words
unless of course, people don't have a CHOICE to simply ignore those words
What is Post modernism
Except that cults of personality are a thing and popular people can convince others to act to their wants/need.
legitimizing that idea, just arms the Left and encourages the state to be more and more intrusive
@SageTheory just ignore him he's full of shit
remember, "those willing to trade liberty for security..."
this is such a trade-off
Incitement has never been protected under the 1st amendment
Trump could probably do some damage if he told his following to attack a group or something.
For example.
Trump wouldn't 'do the damage'
incitement present imminent threat
the reason it's considered illegal is because you have a right to self-defense
only those who acted upon his words would 'do'
the words *in* the incitement themselves are not illegal
words don't harm
actions do
MA just wants to be able to get away with punching whoever says anything he doesn't like
it's the context that presents a threat that does
I guess Hitler isn't responsible for the jew exterminations then
He only asked for it after all
i never said anything of the sort
the direct opposite in fact
well, that seems to be the subtext
if one commits and ACTION, that can be a crime
>implying the holohoax happened
punching is an ACTION
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
So is Hitler 100% innocent MA
but words aren't an action
but muh incitement
After all Hitler just spoke a bunch
<:thunk:462282216467333140>
Hitler didn't kill the jews but he should have
^
fine, destroy the freedoms you fought to protect
Tfw MA has successfully argued Hitler's innocence
The holodomor was an astral projection, the eskimos did 9/11
Those that don't understand history are doomed to repeat it