Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 601917912390959133
Even if no money imvolved
@Lucienne d'Anwyl fuzzy is something I call my untrimmed lady garden. You can't be fuzzy about economics.
Not without a super grid of cameras pluugged into an AI anyway
If you want to lower demand on something you eaise taxes tbh
Prohibiting sonething just makes it taboo
Looking past the fact that if something is in high demand it is probably not very bad
This gives it artifical value
then don't prohibit it, MA
Adds demand
Forbidden = scarcity = value
And behaviuors are the same
No you can make it legal and then use the suppression tatics on the market to reform the price's and re-evaluate budget spending based on the product, with the federal reserve.
british television at it's finest
Wouldn't it be great to be able to run an experiment like that
Exactly
But that is like adfirmitive blacktion
<:cuckertarlson:462285973724856320>
Counter rascism WITH rasism?
You need to fix your spelling, mister
<:brain_blimp:588140316339470347> <:betterthanyou:588043426155593728>
So banning doesnt work. It in fact does the opposite
@ManAnimal yes but like you said when the black market's are phased out then, you have fair distribution of wealth.
That is easy to see economicly
depends on the thing being banned, MA
Induces scarcity
And demand
fair distribution of wealth <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Depending what you want to achieve
@ManAnimal I would high five you but this is discord it doesn't compute.
depends on the thing's utility, the availability of functional alternatives,
There are more factors then that
Not really in the information age
I didn't mean that @ you ecc
You cant easily erase the fact something DID exist
@UnScottable well ... There are a lot of categories ... Depending on the evaluation of the budget reform
And knowing it is now supressesed gives value
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Economics 101 - learning about what income tax is.