Message from @BPO_NightWing
Discord ID: 601918329241862162
But that is like adfirmitive blacktion
<:cuckertarlson:462285973724856320>
Counter rascism WITH rasism?
You need to fix your spelling, mister
Not a net positive
<:brain_blimp:588140316339470347> <:betterthanyou:588043426155593728>
So banning doesnt work. It in fact does the opposite
@ManAnimal yes but like you said when the black market's are phased out then, you have fair distribution of wealth.
That is easy to see economicly
depends on the thing being banned, MA
Induces scarcity
And demand
fair distribution of wealth <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Depending what you want to achieve
@ManAnimal I would high five you but this is discord it doesn't compute.
depends on the thing's utility, the availability of functional alternatives,
There are more factors then that
Not really in the information age
I didn't mean that @ you ecc
You cant easily erase the fact something DID exist
@UnScottable well ... There are a lot of categories ... Depending on the evaluation of the budget reform
And knowing it is now supressesed gives value
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Economics 101 - learning about what income tax is.
That is what a communist says
Goverance isnt economics
state income tax makes sense, federal income tax i do not agree with
It shouldn't be anyway
@ManAnimal yes, because you can change the amount of added value tax and then change the dynamics of the industry as well.
There is no distinction here, UnScottable
Perhaps. But tangential
Daily reminder of centrist regime <:ahegon:566797166258028548> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanation
But that had nothing to do with goverance
If you do that the state just becomes the federal unless the states fund the federal
Nearest thing we have here to federal tax is import duty
well i can understand the use in paying the local government in your area to fix the roads you actually drive on and etc
Gov is just like PERSON-A
but federal income tax?
no, not yet
They can effect and interact with the market