@ManAnimal would you say the universe spinds around the world?

cause i sasy it does

true ferris, not debating that

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/556008289243234314/601971946485317652/image0.jpg

it's the interpretations of the equations that i have issue with

the interference explanation is just a fimsly analogy MA

this is clear when you see the Et version of the inequation

as you know

delta p * delta x > something right?

i know, and then laypeople take and extrapoolate that lay person's example out of context

well that can be rewritten as delta E * delta t > something

like the 'parallel worlds' notion for example

check the units

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

its nto parrelel worlds

its multiverse theory

jesus

differnt theories

same shit really

multiverse is cosmological; valid

https://memeworld.funnyjunk.com/pictures/The+bigs_d7b468_7198271.png

parallel worlds is not

its all ytrans dimensional multiversal membranes

brane theory?

anyway, MA, the uncertainty principle is a lot easier to intuit when you use the frequency-occurrence example instead

that was found to be a dead end with m-theory wasn't it?

but if you dont wanna hear it it is fine

wtf is brane theory?

it's a simple wave function

fourier analysis 101

i thought "membrane" was the theoretical explination for hwo the universe would be seperated

im under the assumption that space always existed

the big ban began time

and all the different "multiverse" are just the same space with different times of creation

yeah MA

haven't heard bout brane theory in a few yrs

different "big bangs"

so it's really weird you used the interference explanation

ya kno?

thus, an component of the series can equally contribute to the overall composite function, be it a resonnant frequency or two intermidate frequencies within the series

ehhhhh