Message from @Christmas Merlin

Discord ID: 601976175153250344


2019-07-20 03:15:07 UTC  

check the units

2019-07-20 03:15:54 UTC  

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

2019-07-20 03:16:22 UTC  

its nto parrelel worlds

2019-07-20 03:16:25 UTC  

its multiverse theory

2019-07-20 03:16:29 UTC  

jesus

2019-07-20 03:16:42 UTC  

differnt theories

2019-07-20 03:16:52 UTC  

same shit really

2019-07-20 03:16:54 UTC  

multiverse is cosmological; valid

2019-07-20 03:17:03 UTC  

parallel worlds is not

2019-07-20 03:17:10 UTC  

its all ytrans dimensional multiversal membranes

2019-07-20 03:17:19 UTC  

brane theory?

2019-07-20 03:17:34 UTC  

anyway, MA, the uncertainty principle is a lot easier to intuit when you use the frequency-occurrence example instead

2019-07-20 03:17:41 UTC  

that was found to be a dead end with m-theory wasn't it?

2019-07-20 03:17:44 UTC  

but if you dont wanna hear it it is fine

2019-07-20 03:17:56 UTC  

wtf is brane theory?

2019-07-20 03:17:59 UTC  

it's a simple wave function

2019-07-20 03:18:08 UTC  

fourier analysis 101

2019-07-20 03:18:10 UTC  

i thought "membrane" was the theoretical explination for hwo the universe would be seperated

2019-07-20 03:18:20 UTC  

im under the assumption that space always existed

2019-07-20 03:18:24 UTC  

the big ban began time

2019-07-20 03:18:42 UTC  

and all the different "multiverse" are just the same space with different times of creation

2019-07-20 03:18:45 UTC  

yeah MA

2019-07-20 03:18:45 UTC  

haven't heard bout brane theory in a few yrs

2019-07-20 03:18:46 UTC  

different "big bangs"

2019-07-20 03:19:06 UTC  

so it's really weird you used the interference explanation

2019-07-20 03:19:09 UTC  

ya kno?

2019-07-20 03:19:51 UTC  

thus, an component of the series can equally contribute to the overall composite function, be it a resonnant frequency or two intermidate frequencies within the series

2019-07-20 03:20:25 UTC  

ehhhhh

2019-07-20 03:20:34 UTC  

that is not quite the point MA

2019-07-20 03:21:15 UTC  

let's me type this one out ma

2019-07-20 03:21:17 UTC  

please

2019-07-20 03:21:23 UTC  

it is my point though; you can only go as far as treating the composite function as a quantity

2019-07-20 03:21:35 UTC  

k;, too late too deep

2019-07-20 03:21:45 UTC  

oh ok

2019-07-20 03:21:48 UTC  

i wait

2019-07-20 03:23:02 UTC  

the longer a signal you get, the more certain you are with the frequency, but then the uncertainty of when the event occurs (the entire duration), this is your continuous wave
but the shorter a signal you get, the more certain you are with the time that it hits, but then the frequency of the pulse, due to fourier tranform, is literally all of the frequencies, meaning you are less certain about the frequency

2019-07-20 03:23:27 UTC  

the measurement here doesnt cause the fundimental uncertainty

2019-07-20 03:23:30 UTC  

it is simply there

2019-07-20 03:23:42 UTC  

that isn't what i was saying

2019-07-20 03:23:45 UTC  

i know