Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 601976071440695296
delta p * delta x > something right?
i know, and then laypeople take and extrapoolate that lay person's example out of context
well that can be rewritten as delta E * delta t > something
like the 'parallel worlds' notion for example
check the units
<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
its nto parrelel worlds
its multiverse theory
jesus
differnt theories
same shit really
multiverse is cosmological; valid
parallel worlds is not
its all ytrans dimensional multiversal membranes
brane theory?
anyway, MA, the uncertainty principle is a lot easier to intuit when you use the frequency-occurrence example instead
that was found to be a dead end with m-theory wasn't it?
but if you dont wanna hear it it is fine
wtf is brane theory?
fourier analysis 101
i thought "membrane" was the theoretical explination for hwo the universe would be seperated
im under the assumption that space always existed
the big ban began time
and all the different "multiverse" are just the same space with different times of creation
yeah MA
haven't heard bout brane theory in a few yrs
different "big bangs"
so it's really weird you used the interference explanation
ya kno?
thus, an component of the series can equally contribute to the overall composite function, be it a resonnant frequency or two intermidate frequencies within the series
ehhhhh
that is not quite the point MA
let's me type this one out ma
please
it is my point though; you can only go as far as treating the composite function as a quantity
k;, too late too deep
oh ok
i wait
the longer a signal you get, the more certain you are with the frequency, but then the uncertainty of when the event occurs (the entire duration), this is your continuous wave
but the shorter a signal you get, the more certain you are with the time that it hits, but then the frequency of the pulse, due to fourier tranform, is literally all of the frequencies, meaning you are less certain about the frequency