Message from @Ferris
Discord ID: 601975183104016385
its not that
who knows. but the notion that the drake equ is useful for anything more than a thought experiment is a bit autistic
as far as fermi, i was talking about his work in physics; not the paradox
anyway MA
@ManAnimal youre here talking about theoretical physics like its anything other then thought experiments
then wave away the drake equation because it is such a thing
and before you go
"MUH MATH, MUH PROOFS"
the real reason why the uncertainty principle is mathematically guaranteed, is because the schrodinger equation has bits that are not commutative
untill shit is demonstrated for us in the real world its a fucking thougth experiment
well im building a time machine in my basement to prove you all wrong
the parts i can show how the math matches theory is differnent than the exprapolation of various theories with no mathematical basis
welp, i cant wait merlin
@ManAnimal would you say the universe spinds around the world?
cause i sasy it does
true ferris, not debating that
it's the interpretations of the equations that i have issue with
the interference explanation is just a fimsly analogy MA
this is clear when you see the Et version of the inequation
delta p * delta x > something right?
i know, and then laypeople take and extrapoolate that lay person's example out of context
well that can be rewritten as delta E * delta t > something
like the 'parallel worlds' notion for example
check the units
<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
its nto parrelel worlds
its multiverse theory
jesus
differnt theories
same shit really
multiverse is cosmological; valid
parallel worlds is not
its all ytrans dimensional multiversal membranes
brane theory?
anyway, MA, the uncertainty principle is a lot easier to intuit when you use the frequency-occurrence example instead
that was found to be a dead end with m-theory wasn't it?
but if you dont wanna hear it it is fine
wtf is brane theory?