Message from @Christmas Merlin
Discord ID: 601974728567291914
It's part of it
no, its a distinct bit of error
even without that
I agree that it's part
can't reconcile general relativity tensor equations with quantum wave functions? anything you can't concisely describe with calculus can be express approximately with statistics; it is god enough
I'm saying that we don't observe them directly
yes
that is fair jack
we dont
@ManAnimal where are all the aliens bro?
MA
its not that
who knows. but the notion that the drake equ is useful for anything more than a thought experiment is a bit autistic
as far as fermi, i was talking about his work in physics; not the paradox
anyway MA
@ManAnimal youre here talking about theoretical physics like its anything other then thought experiments
then wave away the drake equation because it is such a thing
and before you go
"MUH MATH, MUH PROOFS"
the real reason why the uncertainty principle is mathematically guaranteed, is because the schrodinger equation has bits that are not commutative
well im building a time machine in my basement to prove you all wrong
the parts i can show how the math matches theory is differnent than the exprapolation of various theories with no mathematical basis
welp, i cant wait merlin
@ManAnimal would you say the universe spinds around the world?
cause i sasy it does
true ferris, not debating that
it's the interpretations of the equations that i have issue with
the interference explanation is just a fimsly analogy MA
this is clear when you see the Et version of the inequation
as you know
delta p * delta x > something right?
i know, and then laypeople take and extrapoolate that lay person's example out of context
well that can be rewritten as delta E * delta t > something
like the 'parallel worlds' notion for example
check the units
<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
its nto parrelel worlds
its multiverse theory
jesus