Message from @Christmas Merlin
Discord ID: 601974211984228354
@Ferris In order to measure things at that level, we don't see them directly, we bounce shit off of them and measure the change
no it's a mathematical reality
the drake equationa dnt he fermi paradox?
@Ferris You're trolling right?
no
i had to take quantum mechanics
Regardless, that IS how we measure small stuff
yes
its just that is seperate from the uncertainty principle
all im saying
It's part of it
no, its a distinct bit of error
even without that
I agree that it's part
can't reconcile general relativity tensor equations with quantum wave functions? anything you can't concisely describe with calculus can be express approximately with statistics; it is god enough
I'm saying that we don't observe them directly
yes
that is fair jack
we dont
MA
its not that
who knows. but the notion that the drake equ is useful for anything more than a thought experiment is a bit autistic
as far as fermi, i was talking about his work in physics; not the paradox
anyway MA
@ManAnimal youre here talking about theoretical physics like its anything other then thought experiments
then wave away the drake equation because it is such a thing
and before you go
"MUH MATH, MUH PROOFS"
the real reason why the uncertainty principle is mathematically guaranteed, is because the schrodinger equation has bits that are not commutative
untill shit is demonstrated for us in the real world its a fucking thougth experiment
well im building a time machine in my basement to prove you all wrong
the parts i can show how the math matches theory is differnent than the exprapolation of various theories with no mathematical basis
welp, i cant wait merlin
@ManAnimal would you say the universe spinds around the world?
cause i sasy it does
true ferris, not debating that
it's the interpretations of the equations that i have issue with
the interference explanation is just a fimsly analogy MA