Message from @Weez

Discord ID: 602224335960277015


2019-07-20 19:42:02 UTC  

I agree, but they're cheap and reasonably reliable

2019-07-20 19:42:09 UTC  

Compared to designing new reactors

2019-07-20 19:42:18 UTC  

In the next 25 yrs, two resources will become increasingly expensive: 1) is power (we all know) and 2) is freshwater

2019-07-20 19:42:21 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598761542200197120/602223786418503682/spaggot.jpg

2019-07-20 19:42:26 UTC  

Or using, newer reactors which haven't been vetted as much as those older models have

2019-07-20 19:42:26 UTC  

'cheap'?

2019-07-20 19:42:37 UTC  

doubtful

2019-07-20 19:42:43 UTC  

Research of new reactors isn't cheap

2019-07-20 19:42:46 UTC  

ROIE beats ROI

2019-07-20 19:42:47 UTC  

Then the testing of them..

2019-07-20 19:43:00 UTC  

Many iterations..

2019-07-20 19:43:09 UTC  

THEN, you need to actually build them

2019-07-20 19:43:17 UTC  

true, but sooner you start the better your design

2019-07-20 19:43:23 UTC  

Yeah I suppose

2019-07-20 19:43:40 UTC  

We shouldn't be throwing as much money into meme wind as we are

analog sticks are basically miniature tits

change my mind

2019-07-20 19:43:55 UTC  

and if the old design has just one accident, it will derail any nuke deployment

2019-07-20 19:44:23 UTC  

best to have a newer, safer more efficent design with fail-safes

2019-07-20 19:44:30 UTC  

Chernobyl and long-island can be considered 'old designs'

2019-07-20 19:44:30 UTC  

you can hide an accident inland

2019-07-20 19:44:35 UTC  

but by the water

2019-07-20 19:44:44 UTC  

But they only melted down due to human error

2019-07-20 19:44:58 UTC  

Basically, incompetence

2019-07-20 19:45:23 UTC  

well, yes and no. A good design is idiot proof

2019-07-20 19:45:52 UTC  

It doesn't really matter how good the design is, when the operators turn off the automated controls and start dicking around

2019-07-20 19:45:55 UTC  

See. Three Mile *

2019-07-20 19:46:19 UTC  

it's like software. write a program and give it to as many idiots you can find and have them try to break it

2019-07-20 19:46:30 UTC  

the more idiots you can survive, the better the design

2019-07-20 19:46:54 UTC  

Lmao true

2019-07-20 19:47:14 UTC  

oh, but the design does matter because such a system can't BE totally automated

2019-07-20 19:47:47 UTC  

for example, if we had an EMP we would have to worry that the nuke plants never lost power and ran out of diesel

2019-07-20 19:47:52 UTC  

Funnily enough, with three mile, the automated system which the operators disabled could have easily fixed the issue.

2019-07-20 19:47:57 UTC  

or the coolant pumps couldn't run

2019-07-20 19:48:31 UTC  

a good design has a neutral fail state, meaning you don't need to actively do anything to keep it from melting down

2019-07-20 19:48:47 UTC  

Generally, you're always going to need to do *something*

2019-07-20 19:48:52 UTC  

That something will be the control rods.

2019-07-20 19:48:59 UTC  

nope, not with a molten salt design

2019-07-20 19:49:01 UTC  

You ALWAYS want to kill the reaction

2019-07-20 19:49:16 UTC  

it just goes inert and drains into a seperate drain tank