By a fucking mile

gender egalitarianism is extraordinarily radical

'earn"? no one earns rights

And the selective service system can't even legally be male only abymore

they should

>i'm not a radical, now shave my woman ballz

bullshit

selective service is still law

Wait, egalitarianism is now radical?

yes

I don't understand how equal opportunity can be a bad thing

>selective service system exist

despite what one might BELEIVE it's irrelevance

Death just thinks women are infereior

>draft is legally not in placr

Well if you think about it it is quite an uncommon notion in the world

inferior*

when egalitarianism extends to the point you are saying that men and women should have equal legal and political rights

that is absurdly radical

@JackH670 if you apply it all the way, no . if it's selective, yes

that's a argument of exceptions

How is that absurdly radical?

>federal government legally cannot have selective service being male only due to recent court case

Explain to me

what that is

why that is*

because this goes against what every functional civilization ever has done

<:ahegao:462286952335671296>

No it doesn't

fed can't LEGALLY goto war without a congressional vote

but they DO

And even if it does

it's basically something that has only really been in place in parts of the west for the last few decades or so

the law is meaningless

ReTardis

Death ain't wrong you know

Every functioning civ had slavery

unless people hold others accountable

should we bring back slavery?

no