It's about pointing out your discriminatory tendancies

Because your height is the exact same as being born upper or working class

sweet

Then stop people being born gay then, PeP

i don't know if i like that superstition and stereotypy are grouped together

@wacka This man made this test. T'is all u need to know. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno

Is your mind not capable of staying on one topic

Lol what happened to weez

This is the topic, dear

No it’s not

I’m talking about private education

adorno was a fascist because he hated jazz

You're treating who you are born to as fair game to discriminate against

And you’re bringing gays into it

No I’m not discriminating

Sure you are

I said someone who’s been privately educated can’t relate to publicly educated people as well as someone publicly educated

That’s not discrimination

Of course they can

That’s just logic

Ok I’m done lmao

Screenshot

That is so retarded

You can't relate to gays, PeP because you're not gay

You can't relate to women, PeP because you're not a woman

Not being able to relate to them seems fair but I don't think the schools are THAT different either

You can't relate to black people, PeP, because you're not a nigger

it certainly hurts your ability to relate to because there are experiences that are generally particular to these groups that people from outside of them won't have

I don't think PEP is saying muh lived experiences

He is

PEP are you?

That's exactly what he's saying

Well to what end other then

Private school bad

what's wrong with muh lived experiences

I'm not supporting x because x is posh, therefore they cannot relate to me, therefore i don't need to argue against their positions

Yeah, that's what I got from it

I'm not supporting x because x is polish

Meanwhile supporting the EU, imao

If his positions were wrong and the reason they were wrong was of a flaw in his outlook/interpretation of reality, and that came about because of a closeted childhood because private education or class-segregation, then you should trivially be able to argue so

Otherwise it's reductionist and just ends up with "I disagree with x because racism"