Some states I believe do not require seperate indicators and breaklights at the rear

Might be law in new cars now, dunno

Alabama

But wasn't at the time

Yes they do

All states do

It's federal law

not all

at least in america

They need to have three indicators. All of which cannot be on a moving panel.

hell, in some states,m you don't even need doors

How the fuck do you have combined indicators and brake lights

That sounds retarded

which state is it that you dont need a license to drive?

is it ohio?

It is a bit, Jack

America

We do it here, Jack

MS

whats wrong with combined indicators and breaklights

The breaklight turns off and the indicator turns on. Or the breaklight itself is the indicator too

well, 'need' is a function of ability in those places rather than permission

I must've never noticed

It's not common, Jack

there are no cops for hundred km

pretty sure in ohio you dont need a license to drive... or own a gun

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/543284464688693248/604392482628829210/Screenshot_20190726-151924_YouTube.jpg?width=962&height=542

Japanese cars likely to have seperate ones since no point making two models for different markets

Ohio? hmm. figured they'd be more strict

some states like PA have state inspections. Other states like NJ do not

You realise that indicators are separate from the breaks in most US built cars, right?

brakes*

Apparently Trump has 36% of the black vote now

It's just that indicators are the same colour in some circumstances.

If that's the case Trump has a guaranteed 2020

blacks are a tiny minority

two seperate circuits; same lamps most of the time

compared to hispanics

whose votes are much more valuable

if not, same color lamps under one cover

That's a huge jump that could flip states