>OOP is bad

>writes in OOP

OOP is cancer 90% of the time

"Guys!! Look at these things I'm saying I've done!I'm smart, please believe me!!"

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM interesting, but wow.

>Again, he doesn't understand OOP

And you dont know what OOP means clearly

Okay, so you're a programmer. Is that, actually, Computer *Science*? @Coolitic

yo OOP is a faggit

Because members existed before "OOP languages"

Press F

F

EF

🇫

ETH

Ever heard of a struct?

ETHNOSTATE

It existed before OOP

It can have functions and memebers

ever heard of niggers

Public and private

it existed before coolitic

Public and private

DOSE DAMN BLOODY NIGGERS

You idiots were just taught that using classes automatically means OOP

And that is not the case at all

<:brainlet:505799727657254922>

"ME SMART, BELIEVE ME!"

Lol

"YOU GUYS NO SMART!"

real big brain hours

goys

OOGA SMART

That's Coolitic for you

@Coolitic Okay, but where's the *Science* more than the tech? I know, coding is about persistent trial and error. And I've built my share, as well. But your claim earlier depends on the empirical research to differentiate between strata.

What do you call debugging?

>Debugging

>Who does that?

"Persistent trial and error"

Don't write your program with bugs