Message from @Killzone
Discord ID: 609422009297928195
than a bazooka
📔
none of them are as practical as a minuteman or trident or peacekeeper, etc
the navy didnt beleive the threat of radation until sailors started getting sick
Where my DEFCON niggas at?
i wouldn' t call minuteman or trident missles 'practical'
If theyWORK, they are never fired
trident is super practical
SLBMs are extremely practical
like the tirdent II
if a nuclear missle can be c onsidered 'practical' by ANY stretch
I still think the atomic cannon is a cool idea
being able to nuclear shell niggas
they are super practical lol
they were extremely effective in their deterance as they ensured you could never know where the next missle might be fired from
but there are alot more practical ways that firing from a sub
tbh I think the US might start using nukes if they go full replacement with 76 2
that is what worries me
helluva way to get rid of ISIS
i don't beleive that the use of a small nuke by the US won't result in an esclation
no nukes or all nukes
I believe that if the US notifies everyone, as well as the target with enough warning
I wonder if russia would agree to it
to sorta nuke isis
back in the day
And deploys it in a cruise missile that can be tracked
it's why the mid-range treaty was important IMO
people would be outraged, but it would not spark all out war
everyone knew using a nuke of any sort would end badly
>hamas has a twitter
launching an ICBM would absolutely make people not happy and possibly retaliate because mirvs
mid-range weapons place the firing ability in the hands of generals and commander on the front
how about a MRBM
dab
where larger weapons the order has to come from the top
no BM, just put it on a cruise missile
drop it on baghdad