hell, the navy was convinced they could board ships hours after then nuked them

🦆

the artillery cannon

is more practical

than a bazooka

📔

none of them are as practical as a minuteman or trident or peacekeeper, etc

the navy didnt beleive the threat of radation until sailors started getting sick

Where my DEFCON niggas at?

i wouldn' t call minuteman or trident missles 'practical'

If theyWORK, they are never fired

trident is super practical

SLBMs are extremely practical

like the tirdent II

if a nuclear missle can be c onsidered 'practical' by ANY stretch

I still think the atomic cannon is a cool idea

being able to nuclear shell niggas

they are super practical lol

they were extremely effective in their deterance as they ensured you could never know where the next missle might be fired from

but there are alot more practical ways that firing from a sub

https://youtu.be/IKqXu-5jw60

tbh I think the US might start using nukes if they go full replacement with 76 2

that is what worries me

helluva way to get rid of ISIS

once that door is opened the species is doomed

i don't beleive that the use of a small nuke by the US won't result in an esclation

no nukes or all nukes

I believe that if the US notifies everyone, as well as the target with enough warning

I wonder if russia would agree to it

to sorta nuke isis

back in the day

And deploys it in a cruise missile that can be tracked

it's why the mid-range treaty was important IMO

people would be outraged, but it would not spark all out war

everyone knew using a nuke of any sort would end badly

http://twitter.com/not__vee/status/1159757262728192000

>hamas has a twitter

launching an ICBM would absolutely make people not happy and possibly retaliate because mirvs

mid-range weapons place the firing ability in the hands of generals and commander on the front

how about a MRBM

dab