yeah it was abit

but for the AA purpose probably

and gavve the testers cancer

risky

to make a bazooka

but aight

well at that time, they didn't understand the long term effects of ionizing raditation

https://www.youtube.com/user/nuclearvault

they figured if you survived the week, you were good

https://youtu.be/XT5jo7aZzTw

>nibbas not cumming

and yes the US is huge into ICBM w/ MIRV, russia has medium range because they have far more countries that are a threat along the borders

>***Post Nut Clarity***

hell, the navy was convinced they could board ships hours after then nuked them

🦆

the artillery cannon

is more practical

than a bazooka

📔

none of them are as practical as a minuteman or trident or peacekeeper, etc

the navy didnt beleive the threat of radation until sailors started getting sick

Where my DEFCON niggas at?

i wouldn' t call minuteman or trident missles 'practical'

If theyWORK, they are never fired

trident is super practical

SLBMs are extremely practical

like the tirdent II

if a nuclear missle can be c onsidered 'practical' by ANY stretch

I still think the atomic cannon is a cool idea

being able to nuclear shell niggas

they are super practical lol

they were extremely effective in their deterance as they ensured you could never know where the next missle might be fired from

but there are alot more practical ways that firing from a sub

https://youtu.be/IKqXu-5jw60

tbh I think the US might start using nukes if they go full replacement with 76 2

that is what worries me

helluva way to get rid of ISIS

once that door is opened the species is doomed

i don't beleive that the use of a small nuke by the US won't result in an esclation