He literally never said.

He just said that it would

because he's a fucking idiot.

It's dumb shit.

Marxism only described there would be a revolution

A constant revolution.

Not that there should be

Marx said the socialist state would redistribute wealth then wither away because it became unnecessary.

but that's

not how states work

or wealth

or anything

A state always works to make itself bigger than before, that's how it works.

Fascism is literally honest socialism

They hit the point where they're redistributing wealth and say

hold on

we have all this power

we were supposed to get rid of it right?
lmao fuck that

and then they just keep going.

I don't know about that, I've been thinking about that for sometime. I don't think we can position Fascism between Socalism and Capitalism.

No, you can't

its socialism 2.0

literally

It's a third position.

It was made by a socialist to fix the problems inherent in socialism.
It did not succeed.

Fascism is a collectivist nationalist ideology, and it's very socialist, but socialism is not its core idea

It just so happens that collectivist ideologies must be more socialist than capitalist by their nature

Yeah, but they don't really redistribute the means of porduction.

They just central plan it for "The greater good"

because you can't 'redistribute' the means of production

Yeah, fascism allows for some capitalism

you literally cannot

It's a third position.

its fucking meaningless as a statement.

Actually think about what that means, redistributing the means of production, and try to imagine how it would work.

There are two basic things that define socialism:
1) Redistribute wealth
2) Collectivize the means of production

Same with collectivizing it.

https://www.politiscales.net/en_US/results/?e0=24&e1=48&c0=19&c1=55&p1=69&p0=10&s1=69&s0=10&j1=36&j0=33&femi=14&b0=7&b1=86&m1=55&m0=10&t1=40&t0=24&reli=67&prag=67

The only way you can do it is to make them part of the state

which is fascism.

Collectivizing is one way of saying "state owned"