Message from @Death in June
Discord ID: 599471970580693025
You can add more if you like but I know, that once they make up a story they stick to it.
Cliff Richards, won a battle against the BBC.
Lilly Allen, won a press battle, but that was to have an injunction on them.
Cat Deeley, had her phone tapped - but, was too scared to go to court.
Biggest one....
Princess Diana.
Enough said - fake news meant that people were distracted and never really paid attention to what was really going on. Even the celebrities themselves , have had enough of the situation. It needs a hard line government to nip the press in the bud.
The anti-white hatred is strong with this one. The scary part is how many people, usually guilt-ridden white women, might agree with her.
it's mainly single childless women
married women with children tend not to be any more progressive than men afaik because they actually have loyalties
Yeah. I saw an article, can't remember where, that said that women tend to get more xenophobic once they are pregnant. Something to do with actually having an invested biological interest in their group's survival. Whereas men are naturally more protective of the group and cautious of outsiders by default.
This is backed up by the fact that men tend to vote Republican more in the US, which is more in favor of things like stronger border control. In fact, if only men voted, the federal government would almost always be Republican.
In Austria we have mandatory civil service for those who refuse to do military service. It builds character. The US should implement the same system.
Would not surprise me if this was one of the reasons why Austria still has a strong conservative voter base.
I would agree with that. Like how the Romans had the _cursus honorum_ path through civil service that all Roman politicians went through until the late empire.
Yeah. I should add that I believe mandatory services should only exist in a society that has a government and a democratic process. In my ideal society there would be no mandatory services, but in the US it makes perfect sense. I think it makes no sense to argue taxes and regulations are good, but mandatory service is bad.
If anything, mandatory service would ensure that the government gives every citizen a first chance to get a foot in the door, since quite a few people who enter military or civil services end up working there a lot longer than originally intended, plus it looks really good on the CV.
Especially people who argue that people from a certain background can't get a job would be morally required to support this.
No thanks
you could just require civil service for voting rights
Civil/military service + being a net tax payer = voting rights? π€
i would prefer that the demos be split into groups comprising the most fundamental services rendered unto society with membership predicated on filling those roles ie labor (for laborers), childrearing (for married parents), and military service (for military personnel)
Service guarantees citizenship.
you could also add a stipulation that a stint of civil service is required to participate in the process for those who haven't served as a combatant or officer
a working veteran who is married with kids would effectively have three votes
Read the novel, Death. The military is just one of many, many ways to earn citizenship in the Terran Federation.
Petition to have this as a new emoji
Sign with the check mark
Too big
Alright, big think time, why is it that people desire simultaneous unfettered immigration and socialized systems?
egalitarian universalism
@Wardaddy Winston They want to be nice to everyone.
They do that by giving away everything for free, including their country, which was not obtained for free.
They can't afford to give everything away for free, especially if we enshrine giving things away for free as a human right.
Then we'll have the entire world wanting to parasitize off of us instead of building their own countries and their own houses.
But to people who have never had to build a house, or never had to pay taxes, they think that all the good things we have are free.
More so the certain group of mean jealous commies have it in their heads that because some people did some bad things a couple centuries ago, and their actions directly led to the greatest nation on Earth, that all the good things we have are not deserved and we SHOULD give it all to them and the other poor people who never deserved anything....
And that giving things to these poor people excuses and covers up all the bad things someone else's ancestors may have done.
And the people who genuinely want to be nice to everyone are compelled by these commies to give away everything their ancestors fought for and built up through unique ingenuity and skill.
If those poor people had the ingenuity and skill that we graciously presume of every American, they wouldn't need our help.
@JoeyJoestar1337 wait for it... The British press strike at men again π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π³ Seriously, the sexist behaviour is disgraceful.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/12/country-beta-males-alphas-latin-president-tweeting-enemies#ampshare=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/12/country-beta-males-alphas-latin-president-tweeting-enemies
Oooo lawd
1. What's wrong with having a mature man run the country?