No they don't

They fuck they don't

Many people dont give a shit about the person ethics of others and dont have any particularly strong rules that they follow themselves

*personal

even anarchists have a moral guideline that drives their principles, that guideline being "Nobody should be able to tell me what to do ever, I Do what I want!"

That is the definition of libertinism

and they still have that Pure Moral Guideline.

and the Hardcore ones are as puritanical about it as the Pilgrims.

Is athism a religion?

Atheism

I would consider it such yes.

Not Organized maybe.

but it is still a belief about the composition of our cosmos.

In that case puritanism is a belief in positive moral guidelines

and everyone has positive moral guidelines

Libertinism has a single negative moral guideline

The idea that one's moral principles should not and indeed do not influence public life is literally insane

"i can do what I want" is not a positive moral guideline

yes it is

"You can't tell me what to do, it's immoral"

It is the rejection of moral guidelines

So?

Moral guidelines of who?

the person Reeing about being told what to do.

If you're rejecting, say, Stalin's moral guidelines

Then it's good

Unless you are Stalin 😛

Then it is bad

Well ye ofc

and that is where it all falls apart because the "Morality" of it is completely subjective.

If morality is subjective then you are probably a linertine

Linertine?

Wtf

Linertine

What the fuck is that you faggot

Lol libertine

Stupid autocorrect

Meme - Yet I came across in that as a "puritain"

Do you believe that strong sexual morals should be enforced using social but not necessarily government pressure?

If not then the test probably needs to be adjusted

This whole mess comes from the fact that at some point Eurofag intellectuals decided that man should be the one to dictate his own moral rules instead of following an assumed to be divinely mandated rule set. What that almost immediately lead to (though intellectually it took time to crystalize like that exactly) is the idea that every person's moral compass is inherently valuable and trying to societally "infringe" upon the alleged moral code of any given person is inherently evil. Thus you get the obvious situation wherein pedos are demanding pedo rights and, just in general, """""minorities""""" become the whole point of political debate. No one even thinks to propose that said minorities might just be wrong.