Read siege

THIS

<:GWmemetownOMEGALUL:380058735214723072> <:GWmemetownOMEGALUL:380058735214723072>

Just opened a leftist streamer after a while and the first thing I hear is a discussion on whether "asspain" is a homophobic slur

lol

Then they moved on to discuss whether "butthurt" and calling Pete Buttigeig as "booty judge" is homophobic or not

Why are you even listening to that shit? Are you masochistic?

Went there to see an analysis of Democrat debates

lol

And have some variety in political commentators

I can understand variety in political commentators, but there is variety and there is idiocy

If a woman can remove consent the night after sex
Can she grant consent the night after r-p-?

https://news.gallup.com/poll/261722/redress-slavery-americans-oppose-cash-reparations.aspx

How the fuck are hispanics split on that?

Because most of them probably don't expect to be the ones paying the reparations

It's a moral hazard issue. You take more consideration into foolish ideas if you expect them to cost you personally, or to cost people you like.

Maybe one half just wants them to shut the fuck up.

It is somewhat reassuring to see that a quarter of blacks also realize it's bullshit

Honorary citizen of Sowelltopia, confirmed.

lol, even the slim majority of democrats are like, "WTF?"

oh

nm, that's party ID with leaners

it's flipped for those who are party members

Kike.

i just want to point out that according to that response result, a majority of the black people they surveyed were democrats

Literally if you go up to a black person and ask 'democrat or republican' you can automatically assume the answer to your question

"Should you get paid for free by the government for shit that happened a long ass time ago and have no strings attached but it be at the expense of literally everyone else"

Tis a question of the good or yourself or the good of society, and when your life or wellbeing is not at stake, a normal human being would rather society benefit as a whole than take a small benefit to themselves

http://is2.4chan.org/pol/1564820249262.jpg

Dunno what I'm seeing is that, on issues, minorities are a lot less Democrat than they are in voting. Something I already noticed. Remember for the black respondents the question was *should we give you money?* (what I like to call 'Yang voting')And they answered yes at aa lower percentage than they vote D. Same for Hispanics. When you ask on *issues* minorities lean a lot further right than voting trends would have you believe. But half a century of 'Weepubwicans are Wassist' propaganda has an effect I suppose.

@Jym Yeah, many minorities often lean less democrat on specific issues, but they vote as a block due to strategy and tribal affiliation. One of the points of strategy being, whites are perceived as the biggest competitor when it comes to power, so banding in coalition seems essential to challenging that power. Meanwhile, whites tend to be more inclined to issue voting, because most don't operate under the same kind of threat narrative. It's a complacency which is likely to erode the less of a majority whites are, and they begin to recognize their vulnerability to predatory coalitions. The irony being that the less of a majority whites become, the less imperative it is for these coalitions to *maintain coalition.* The less of an obstacle whites are perceived to be, the more minorities will begin jockeying for factional power, rather than coalition power. There are already signs of this with Muslim representatives, challenging Israel with offhand remarks. The Jewish faction of the coalition is often very swift in course correcting such dissidents, and putting them back on mission, "Stop infighting, the real obstacle is white men!"

I really don't see whites as being very issue oriented as voters. Hardly anyone is TBH. Most people don't know their own congressman's voting record, It's mostly choosing a jersey and rooting for a team.

Make no mistake, most people in general are extremely low information voters.

More often than not, people will operate in a tribal fashion. But when comparing demographics, whites are more split between parties over issues other than over race. Or at least, that has been the case until more recently. It's being forced into being a priority issue, where for at least a few decades, interest in that dimension of politics among whites had been declining considerably.

And there seem to be two primary factors. Proximity to a dramatic demographic shift, and antagonism from the media. The secondary factor, chan culture and whatnot, is more a consequence than a cause.

Well not really. Like I said the DNC has been pushing the republicans racist narrative for a long time and the media and education are left so they have been backing it. Because formationaly they are far enough left that they don't represent many Americans at all on the issues. The whole white identity thing is just an unintended consequence of their misguided social engineering. You take a generation of young people and raise them with the idea that race is somehow a fundamental category and even when they rebel they hold that paradigm. Which makes them useless as conservatives.

Yes, they have been pushing this narrative for a while, and it's generally either worked, or been ignored. Pretty much no one has been attacking the legitimacy of the moral premise being presented. That people preferring their own is inherently wicked, and uniquely so for whites, more than for any other group.

https://youtu.be/HqiWFLsgVi4

Of all the truly wicked conceptions of the 20th century, few are as wicked as the assertion that love for brothers in the other races of mankind can only come at the cost of despising their own.

Or of apathy for their nature, their history, their values, their family.