Message from @Weez
Discord ID: 610153197603913789
Tim Pool touts Free speech but even he wanted the movie
Pulled
Though I guess Tim Pool isn’t on the right
But sure I don’t disagree with that
I don't know if trump has ever expressed an opinion on free speech one way or another, if not, some of his supporters acting against it is not therefore out of the realms of possibility.
they were pointing out the hypocrisy of censoring right wing speech because it promotes violence while you make a movie promoting violence against the right wing, they never expected you idiots to actually pull the thing?
I don’t think it was promoting violence at all actually.
And they wanted it pulled because they misinterpreted the film and it hurt their feelings. Count dankula had a good take that we shouldn’t give in to the outrage mob.
You can’t give the cultural Marxists an inch; you need to be consistent
What is a cultural marxist?
I don't know of anyone who gave a shit about Hunt
and of the people I do know on the "right" who are in favor of strategic censorship, they seem to operate more on the basis of the old "public decency" standards
as in, stuff that's pornographic, or glorifies non-traditional lifestyles, or assorted "degeneracy"
I think cultural marxists are just people who celebrate marxism.
That or people who still cry out cultural appropriation
I don't even know what "Hunt" is, tbh
I don't really care about hollywood bullcrap, for the most part
it's all garbage
Tim pool is retarded man lmao
did you go beyond the headline?
or did you make a retarded and false assumption and not catch on to the sarcasm?
> not catch on to the sarcasm
> sarcasm
> not catch on to
Regarding *Hunt*, I haven't heard a damn thing about it.. what was so reprehensible that folks called for it being pulled? (Sorry, not gonna pollute my search history with that one. >.>)
Regarding Pool on Conspiracy theories, haven't seen the vid yet, but YT keeps on directing me to 'im through Autoplay (despite what politics I'm *actually* in the mood to hear), so undoubtedly I'll be forced to watch it anyhow.. but if the premise is anything similar to my own, *shrugs* odds are odds. We have no details, and assumptions really don't help here.
Sargon's comparison to Brexit and WW2 is not only inaccurate.
In Sargon's comparison he compares that we shouldn't surrender to the EU like we didn't surrender in WW2.
When in regards to WW2 we didn't surrender because we wanted to influence the politics of Europe.
We were at no real threat of invasion.
On the contrary Nazi Germany was at threat from us.
Surely to advocate the UK being independent of the EU it means the EU is independent of the UK.
If Sargon believes the Europe should have no business in the matters of the UK isn't it hypocrisy to advocate the UK's influence over Europe.
I.e the exact thing WW2 was fought over.
If you get what I mean
So when brexit happens they will never talk with EU again?
What
It just sounds like your saying in order for Britain to influence europe they have to be subservient
Trading doesn't mean influencing their politics.
If a war happens in Europe then I don't see why that's any of my business.
until they come to conquer you
and trading of course means influencing politics theres an entire trade war going on between US and China right now
But when they actual don't and would rather have peace
who wants peace?
The Nazis
lolz
nazis didnt want peace
They didn't want to invade Britain they were to busy getting fucked up by the Russians